HILLARY CLINTON IS GUILTY IN MORE THAN ONE ACCUSATION…

These articles are a compilation of reshared articles

with extra topic related additions, that I’ve found while researching + my own notes / opinions, I’ve also added related graphics, and in the end there’s extra topic related information added, to support this article and my agreeing biases)

Article:

HILLARY CLINTON IS GUILTY IN MORE THAN ONE ACCUSATION… 

Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-40-33

BREAKING VIDEO: NON DUPLICATE EMAIL’S HAVE BEEN FOUND ON WEINER’S LAPTOP..

By: AMY MORENO, NOVEMBER 2, 2016 – BREAKING NEWS

Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-38-33

Well, that’s it, folks – the LAST hope the Clinton campaign had is now gone.

They were hoping all of the emails on Weiner’s laptop were duplicates, but tonight we learn that is not the case.

Fox News is reporting that emails found on Weiner’s laptop are NOT duplicates.

This situation just got a lot more serious for Hillary Clinton.
… Yet even more serious consequences for Hillary Clinton is waiting…

Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-32-52

USA NEWS 11:10 P.M – Nov 2, 2016

@USANEWS007

BREAKING!!! Non Duplicate Emails have been discovered on Anthony Weiners Laptop, from Hillary Clinton’s Criminal Server.. 

388ea3fe8eb6135aa0b8146ef63be408~2789717099..jpg

#PodestaEmails

images (26)

● Anthony Wiener is convicted of pedophila and he is married to Huma Aberdin, that is Hillary Clintons, closest confidant.

0_HILLARY CLINTON SNUFF MOVIE

NOVEMBER 3, 2016

The facts that’s been proven accurate, about Hillary Clintons criminal activites are:

What’s being revealed about Hillary Clinton is far more serious and will result in her being placed on war crimes charges.

● The evidence shows that Hillary Clinton greenlighted, supported and armed with Saudi Qatar and the GCC the Wahhabist jihadist terror groups of : Muslim brotherhood, al Qeada al Nusra Islamic state & Boko haram.

● They have murdered over 500,00 across the Middle East and North Africa and created over 4 million refugees.

● Hillary Clinton has to be charged for her role in this genocide.

● Hillary Clinton and her assistent Huma Aberdin, has been caught with hiddeous crimes in a video (uploaded on the deep dark webb). In the video Hillary Clinton and Huma Aberdin is sexually molesting, torturing and murdering a underaged girl, before they kill the girl, they skin her face off, and Hillary is taunting the crying and screaming girl by taking the piece of skinned face and placing it on top of her own face, while dancing and laughing and singing..

● Hillary Clinton first denied that she deliberatly had tried to delete the whole content of private emails, on a server that was related to her office in the white house, trying to hide evidence of her crimes and betrayal against America.

● As the USA political and legal system is now found corrupted, the international body to deal with this is the International Criminal Court in The Hague of which the USA is a signatory.

● Hillary when found guilty could even face the death penalty for the scale of her deciet, corruption and genocide.

Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-31-00Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-31-47

BELOW LINK TO THE SOURCE:
https://truthfeed.com/breaking-video-non-duplicate-emails-have-been-found-on-weiners-laptop/33579/

___________________________________________________________

Article:

a6d8607bc9de3114fd52118993216293

DID HILLARY CLINTON VIOLATE ANY OF THESE SIX CRIMINAL STATUTES?

hqdefault

By: Eric Zuesse, 15 June 2018

utut6

The U.S. Government still refuses to present any of these 6 criminal cases, against her, to a grand jury. 

Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-39-31

On 14 June 2018, the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Justice ruled that the FBI was correct to have recommended that the U.S. Department of Justice not prosecute, nor even investigate and place before a grand jury for consideration, a charge that Hillary Clinton had violated, even just a single one ofthe following 6 U.S. federal criminal statutes. But do you think she violated one or more of them? 

HILLARY ROTTEN CANNIBAL CLINTON

HERE THEY ARE:

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

(a) Destruction or Removal of Property To Prevent Seizure

Whoever, before, during, or after any search for or seizure of property by any person authorized to make such search or seizure, knowingly destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of preventing or impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody or control or to continue holding such property under its lawful custody and control, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Impairment of In Rem Jurisdiction

Whoever, knowing that property is subject to the in rem jurisdiction of a United States court for purposes of civil forfeiture under Federal law, knowingly and without authority from that court, destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of impairing or defeating the court’s continuing in rem jurisdiction over the property, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1512 — Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(c) Whoever corruptly

(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 2071 — Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 641 — Public money, property or records

Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use, or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof, …

Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years or both. …

18 U.S. Code § 793 — Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information …

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —

Shall be fined not more than $10, 000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy, shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

*

0_WANTED_OBAMA & HILLARY

DgSDTt8XcAEU-Pf

What do you think? As you consider the matter, you might want to know two things:

First, that the FBI’s ‘investigation’ of Clinton’s privatized email system was faked: it ignored each one of these six statutes.

clinton-h556517343.png

Second, there were at least two cases that had been mentioned in the news media in which the U.S. federal Government did, in fact, investigate, and bring charges, and win a conviction on one or more of these federal charges, and which at leastseem to differ from what Clinton did in only one respect — that she did it far more extensively, and more brazenly, than did that prosecuted person. The independent journalist who goes by the pseudonym “Tyler Durden” headlined, only a day after Mr. Comey on 5 July 2016 exonerated Ms. Clinton, “Meet Bryan Nishimura, Found Guilty For ‘Removal And Retention Of Classified Materials’,” and that conviction of Nishimura was won on the same statute for which the FBI’s Comey, as Clinton’s would-be policeman, jury, and judge, peremptorilyexonerated her — refused to bring any charge at all. “Durden”, at his famous “Zero Hedge” site, noted:

“Here is the FBI itself, less than a year ago, charging one Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom [California], who pleaded guilty to ‘unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials’ without malicious intent, in other words precisely what the FBI alleges Hillary did (h/t@DavidSirota)”.

He linked to this case. Nishimura was sentenced to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. He was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance, and to never again seek such a clearance. (Hillary Clinton continued to have her security clearance, and to run for the U.S. Presidency.)

Furthermore, even before Comey had announced Clinton’s exoneration, Josh Gersten at ‘Politico’, had already headlined on 27 May 2016, “Sub sailor’s photo case draws comparisons to Clinton emails”, and he reported that,

“A Navy sailor [Kristian Saucier] entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus. … To some, the comparison to Clinton’s case may appear strained. Clinton has said none of the information on her server was marked classified at the time”.

‘Politico’s’, Gersten took her word for it, that “none of the information on her server was marked classified at the time,” but is the FBI supposed to do that — to take a suspect’s allegation at face-value, instead of to check it out? (Should Gersten even have done that?)

There probably are other such prosecutions that have successsfully been pursued, but the news media don’t seem to be interested in following up on this matter now, any more than the U.S. federal Government has done. If the U.S. federal Government doesn’t want to investigate Clinton on any of these six criminal statutes, then that’s good enough for the news-media — or is it? Will it be “enough”?

So, wherever the present article is published, and if there is a reader-comments section there, then: What do you think? Is this treatment of what Hillary Clinton did, “Equal Justice Under Law”? Obviously, it’s bipartisan, politically (unless Trump will now demand his FBI to examine what she did on each one of these six statutes); but, in terms of justice: Is this matter, thus far, equal justice under law? Or not? And, if it’s not, then what does that say about whether our country is a democracy? What do you think about these questions?

 

PGate

____________________________________________________________

Article:

Screenshot_2018-08-11-16-33-23

DAMNING HILLARY EMAILS PROBE REPORT..

By: Stephen Lendman, 16 June 2018

clinton_emails_via_abc_news

Department of Justice (DOJ)Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz investigated Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private server use for official State Department business – including easily hacked documents marked “classified,” “secret” and “top secret”.

She’s criminally culpable for violating State Department rules and US statute laws, prohibiting documents and other information pertaining to national security and defense from being moved or removed from their “proper place of custody”.

Former FBI director James Comey obstructed justice, dismissively calling her criminality “extreme carelessness”, making him complicit in serious wrongdoing.

Ordinary Americans are held to one standard, privileged ones another, justice whatever powerful figures want it to be. Rule of law principles don’t matter.

Horowitz found evidence of FBI “willingness” to damage Trump’s presidential campaign when James Comey served as director.
The 500-page IG report included detailed information on FBI and DOJ dysfunctional and unaccountable actions throughout the probe into Hillary’s private server use for official State Department business.
A damning text message between FBI agent Peter Strzokand his mistress Lisa Page, former attorney for then-deputy agency director Andrew McCabe, said:

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it…”
Lisa Page said; – Trump is “not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Peter Strzok responded:

“No, no he won’t, we’ll stop it”!
Peter Strzok served as deputy assistant director to special counsel Mueller’s Russiagate witch-hunt investigation, leading the probe – later removed because of anti-Trump text messages with bureau lawyer Lisa Page.

Peter Strzok changed the FBI’s language about Hillary’s illegal email server use for official State Department business from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” an attempt to whitewash her criminality.

Text messages between; Peter Strzok and Lisa Page showed that; James Comey lied to Congress under oath, claiming he didn’t consult with the ‘DOJ’ or White House about the Hillary probe.
In his report, Michael Horowitz said;

Peter Strzok’s text messages and actions are “not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”, adding:

The ‘Russiagate’ probe “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations”.
That alone is reason enough to end the witch-hunt – what never should have been initiated in the first place, begun and continuing solely to delegitimize president Trump for the wrong reasons (not the right ones) and bash Russia.
NOTHING JUSTIFIES WHAT’S GOING ON!

In response to the IG report, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton issued the following statement:

“The IG report has destroyed the credibility of the Department of Justice and the FBI. It confirms what Judicial Watch has investigated and revealed for nearly two years”.
“The Obama DOJ/FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was rushed, half-baked, rigged, and irredeemably compromised by; anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias and actions”.
“As Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal, it is outrageous to see a politicized FBI and ‘DOJ’ then so obviously refuse to uphold the rule of law”.
“The IG report details repeated ‘DOJ’/FBI deference to Hillary Clinton, her aides and their lawyers”.
“Americans should examine the report and judge for themselves whether the over-the-top deference to Hillary Clinton can be explained as anything other than political, especially from agencies that at the same time were actively collaborating with the Clinton campaign’s Fusion GPS to spy on and target then-candidate Trump”.
“The IG report details how at least five top FBI agents and lawyers exchanged pro-Clinton and anti-Trump communications”.
“The IG shares the concerns of Judicial Watch and millions of Americans that this bias cast a cloud over the credibility of the Clinton email and Russia investigations”.

“As Judicial Watch has demonstrated through its independent investigations and lawsuits, there is more than enough evidence that Clinton knowingly and intentionally mishandled classified information while using a non-government email system to conduct government business”.
“Will the Sessions Justice Department now do the right thing and conduct a Clinton email investigation properly?”
“Or will it let James Comey and (Obama attorney general) ‘Loretta Lynch’, have the last word on Hillary Clinton’s evident email crimes?
“In the meantime, Judicial Watch will continue its ongoing FOIA lawsuits and investigations into the Clinton email scandal and the related Obama administration cover-up”.
Law Professor Jonathan Turley, said the following:

“The IG sinks Comey’s narrative with a finding that he ‘deviated’ from Justice Department rules and acted in open insubordination”.
“There is now a comprehensive conclusion by career investigators that Comey violated core (FBI) rules…In other words, there was ample reason to fire James Comey”.

There’s clear ample reason to hold Hillary, Comey and others accountable for their unlawful actions. 

0_qanon_hillary clinton before delteting the files on the server133797605..jpg

0_qanon_hillary clinton about wikileaks1353989653..jpg

0_qanon_hillary clinton & the snuff film on wieners laptop334826436..jpg

0_qanon_hillary clinton after the election93978327..jpg

0_qanon_hillary clinton minutes before qanon got hack-tacked1644447922..jpg

LIST OF KNOWN PEDO-NAMES IN AMERICA:


LIST OF POLITICAL CONNECTED PEDO-NAMES:


● Hillary Clinton
● Bill Clinton
● George Nader (Businessman)
● Huma Aberdin
● Laura Silsby
● Rachel Chandler
● Jeffrey Epstein
● Ghislaine Maxwell
● John Podesta
● Michael Podesta
● James Alefantis
● Anthony Wiener
● Leslie Wexner (Limited Inc Chairman)
● Herbert Strauss
● Isidor Strauss
● Martin A. Nowak
● Steven Spielberg
● Edgar Bronfman Sr. (Seagram Chairman)
● Charles Bronfman (Seagram Co)
● Michael Steinhardt (former hedge-fund manager)
● Sara Bronfman
● Clare Bronfman
● Niles Lehman (Professor at Portland State University)
● Seth Roger
● Ruth Ginsberg
● Alison Mack
● Rachel Chandler
● Robert Maxwell


LIST OF HOLLYWOOD PEDO-NAMES:


● Steven Spielberg
● Michael Jackson
● Kevin Spacey
● Marc Collins-Rector (Founder of Den)
● Chad Shackley
● Brock Pierce
● David Geffen
● Tom Hanks
● Dustin Hoffman
● Andrew Kreisberg (American television writer, producer)
● Bryan Singer
● Harvey Weinstein
● Bob Weinstein
● Roman Polanski
● Ruma Hazard
● Charlie Sheen
● Madonna
● Kate Perry
● Miley Cyrus

● Marina Abramovic 

● Robert Redford

● Clint Eastwood 

 


LIST OF NAMES OF VISITORS ON EPSTEIN ISLAND:


● Chris Tucker
● Larry Summers
● Lisa Summers
● Bill Murray
● Bill Hammond
● Ehud Barak
● Andrés Pastrana (Former President of Colombia 1998-2002)
● Jean Luc Brunel
● Doug Band
● Ron Burkle
● Woody Allen
● Sarah Kellen
● Ray Barzanna
● Sandy Burger
● Andrea Mitrovitch
● Peter Marino
● Shelley Lewis
● Paul Hala(t) (d) a
● Richardo Legoretta
● Tom Pritzker
● Kelly Spamm
● Tiffany Gramza
● Claire Hazel
● Paula Epstein
● Mark Epstein
● Ralph Elison
● Sophie Biddle
● Audrey Raimbault
● Shelley Harrison
● Melinda Luntz
● Gwendolyn Beck
● Albert Pinto
● Linda Pinto
● Gary Roxburgh
● Mandy Elison
● Jean Michelle Gathy
● Virginia Roberts
● Kristy Rodgers (Kristina Real Rodgers)
● Greg Holbert
● Alyssa Rodgers
● Juliette Bryant
● Heather Mann
● Ed Tuttle
● Glen Dubin
● Ellen Spencer
● Chris Wagner
● Casey Wasserman
● Laura Wasserman
● Paul Mellon
● Oliver Sachs
● Henry Rosovsky
● Lynn Forester (de Rothschild)
● Joe Pagano
● Naomi Campbell
● Nicole Junkermann
● Rodney Slater
● Magali Blachon (Deperrier)
● Svetlana Griaznova
● Emmy Tayler
● Larry Visoski
● Teala Davies
● Juan (Pablo) Molyneux
● Freya Willemoes) Wissing
● Adam Perry Lang
● Fleur Perry Lang
● Caren Casey
● Hank Coller
● Cindy Lopez
● Mark Lloyd
● Alan Dershowitz
● Seth Green
● James Gunn
● Steven Spielberg
● Tom Hanks
● Steven Colbert
● Jimmy Kimmel
● Barack Obama
● Kevin Spacey
● Kathy Griffin
● Oprah Winfrey
● Shawn Carter
● Beyoncé Knowles
● Anthony Kiedis
● John Legend
● Chrissy Tiegen
● Jim Carrey
● Steven Tyler
● Ben Affleck
● Stephen Collins
● Will Ferrell
● Aliaune Damala Badara Thiam (Akon)
● Marshall Matters
● Jeffrey Jones
● Victor Salva
● Mark Collins Rector
● Charlie Sheen
● Tyler Grasham
● Madonna Ciccone
● Katheryn Hudson
● Gwen Stefani
● Stefani Germanotta
● James Franco
● Will Smith
● Justin Roland
● John Cusack
● Anderson Cooper
● Demi Moore
● Brian Affleck
● Meryl Streep
● Wanda Sykes
● Chelsea Handler
● Michelle Wolf
● David Yarovesky
● Pharrell Williams
● Quentin Tarantino
● Courtney Love
● Alec Baldwin
● Robert Downey Jr.

● Prince Andrew 

● 

5 thoughts on “HILLARY CLINTON IS GUILTY IN MORE THAN ONE ACCUSATION…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s