DARPA

DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Program) First published on: June 2008. DARPA, & THE PATENTED BIO-WEAPON.. “On the 5th of June 2008, which is an important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA = the Defense Advanced Research Program, in the United States actively took an interest in coronavirus as a biological […]

DARPA

FRONTLINE DOCTORS & CREW-WORLDWIDE:

[image]: DR. SIMONE GOLD, M.D, PHYSICIAN & FOUNDER OF AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS, USA DOCTORS, NURSES, SCIENTISTS, AUTHORS,  RESEARCHERS &  FREEDOM FIGHTERS: • FRONTLINE DOCTORS    • WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE • CORONA INVESTIGATIVE COMITTEE • DOCTORS FOR TRUTH,  NETHERLANDS • WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE • ORWELL CITY • LA QUINTA COLUMNA • COVID LEGAL • THE COVID BLOG […]

FRONTLINE DOCTORS &  CREW-WORLDWIDE:

Think the White Hat Patriots are screwing with Suck-a-Buck?

I do. WAR! https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/facebook-instagram-whatsapp-outages

Think the White Hat Patriots are screwing with Suck-a-Buck?

FACEBOOK’S PATENTS REVEALS ITS CREEPY PLANS TO COLLECT MORE DATA..

[eng]: FACEBOOK’S PATENTS REVEALS ITS CREEPY PLANS TO COLLECT MORE DATA..

First published on: June 25, 2018

Since 2008, Facebook has been under fire because of its data collecting habits, and each time the company claimed to take up the “responsibility to protect user information.”
The social media giant promised it would “do better,” but a review of patents filed by Facebook reveals how the company wants to track every aspect of our lives: your identity, who you are close with, relationship status, your political and religious views, etc.

According to New York Times, Facebooks has filed patents to use the front-facing cameras to read users’ expressions 
and determine whether 
you liked the content displayed on your feed.
The company also wants to track your socio-
economic status, how many hours of sleep you get, and it has even attempted to predict when your friends will die!

Even though Facebook says that its patent applications do not necessarily exhibit its future product plans, but altogether they expose the company’s incessant hunger for collecting users’ personal information and find ways to monetize it.

FACEBOOKS CREEPY PATENTS: 

Despite the promises 
made by; Mark Zuckerberg, these seven Facebook patent applications unveil the
company’s plans to amass, and exploit your personal information:

1. PROFILING YOUR RELATIONSHIP STATUS:

This patent analyzes data like how many times you check out another user’s profile or the number of persons in your profile picture to predict where you are involved in a romantic relationship.

2. CATEGORIZING BASED ON YOUR PERSONALITY:

One patent suggests the use of personal messages, and posts to analyze personality traits. By determining the extent of extroversion, your emotional stability, and thought process, it could target you with news stories, or ads you might like.

3. PREDICTING YOUR FUTURE: 

This patent application proposes using your 
messages, and posts along with credit card transactions, and location to predict occurrences of major life events like birth, death, or  graduation.

4. IDENTIFYING YOUR CAMERA:

Another patent suggests analyzing of photographs to establish a unique camera “signature”, based on faulty pixels, or scratches on the lens. This signature could be used to find out who have uploaded pictures,  clicked by your device.

5. EAVESDROPPING ON YOU:

This one aims to use phone’s microphone, to listen in on your private conversations, and  identify which TV shows you watch, and ads you mute.

6. TRACKING YOUR DAILY ROUTINE: 

This one is really creepy and dangerous as it suggests monitoring your weekly routine, and notifying other users in case of any deviations from the routine – How to make stalking easy 101. Moreover, it proposes using phone’s location at midnight to track the exact place where you live.

7. USING LOCATION SERVICE TO ESTABLISH A PATTERN:

This patent describes using your phone location as well as your friends’ to determine  whom you are closest to, and where you hang out. Also, it suggests monitoring phone to track how many hours of sleep you get.
It is a known fact that companies file patents to beat their competitors in technologies, even if they may never see the light of the day. The same could be applied to some of Facebook’s patents since advertising is crucial for the company’s business model.

NOTE!
We should be wary of such rampant data collections as we now know that it could be used for more than targeted advertising like manipulating election results, and users’ emotions too.
___________________

[pol]: PATENTY FACEBOOKA UJAWNIAJĄ SWOJE PRZERAŻAJĄCE PLANY GROMADZENIA WIĘKSZEJ ILOŚCI DANYCH..

Dnia: 25 czerwca 2018 r.

Od 2008 roku Facebook jest pod ostrzałem z powodu swoich nawyków gromadzenia danych i za każdym razem firma twierdziła, że bierze na siebie „odpowiedzialność za ochronę informacji o użytkownikach”.
Gigant mediów społecznościowych obiecał, że „będzie lepiej”, ale przegląd patentów zgłoszonych przez Facebooka ujawnia, w jaki sposób firma chce śledzić każdy aspekt naszego życia: twoją tożsamość, z kim jesteś blisko, status związku, twoje poglądy polityczne i religijne itp.

Według; ‘New York Times‘, Facebook złożył wniosek o patent na używanie przednich kamer do odczytywania wyrazów twarzy użytkowników i określić, czy podobały Ci się treści wyświetlane na Twoim kanale. Firma chce również śledzić Twoje status ekonomiczny, ile godzin snu masz, a nawet próbował przewidzieć, kiedy umrą Twoi znajomi!

Chociaż Facebook twierdzi, że jego aplikacje patentowe niekoniecznie pokazują jego plany dotyczące przyszłych produktów, ale ogólnie ujawniają nieustanny głód firmy na gromadzenie danych osobowych użytkowników i znajdowanie sposobów na zarabianie na nich.

PRZERAŻAJĄCE PATENTY FACEBOOKA:

Pomimo obietnic zrobione przez; Mark Zuckerberg, te siedem zgłoszeń patentowych Facebooka ujawnia
plany firmy dotyczące gromadzenia i wykorzystywania Twoich danych osobowych:

1. PROFILOWANIE STATUSU ZWIĄZKU:

Ten patent analizuje dane, takie jak ile razy sprawdzasz profil innego użytkownika lub liczba osób na Twoim zdjęciu profilowym, aby przewidzieć, gdzie jesteś zaangażowany w romantyczny związek.

2. KATEGORYZACJA NA PODSTAWIE TWOJEJ OSOBOWOŚCI:

Jeden patent sugeruje wykorzystanie osobistych wiadomości i postów do analizy cech osobowości.  Określając zakres ekstrawersji, twoją stabilność emocjonalną i proces myślowy, może on skierować do ciebie wiadomości lub reklamy, które mogą ci się spodobać.

3. PRZEWIDYWANIE PRZYSZŁOŚCI:

To zgłoszenie patentowe proponuje użycie twojego
wiadomości i posty wraz z transakcjami kartami kredytowymi i lokalizacją, aby przewidzieć wystąpienie ważnych wydarzeń życiowych, takich jak narodziny, śmierć lub ukończenie szkoły.

4. IDENTYFIKACJA KAMERY:

Inny patent sugeruje analizę zdjęć w celu ustalenia unikalnego „podpisu” aparatu na podstawie wadliwych pikseli lub zadrapań na obiektywie. Ten podpis może być użyty do sprawdzenia, kto przesłał zdjęcia kliknięte przez Twoje urządzenie.

5. PODSŁUCHIWANIE CIEBIE:

Ten ma na celu użycie mikrofonu telefonu, podsłuchiwanie prywatnych rozmów i identyfikowanie oglądanych programów telewizyjnych i wyciszanych reklam.

6. ŚLEDZENIE CODZIENNEJ RUTYNY:

Ten jest naprawdę przerażający i niebezpieczny, ponieważ sugeruje monitorowanie cotygodniowej rutyny i powiadamianie innych użytkowników w przypadku jakichkolwiek odchyleń od rutyny – Jak ułatwić stalking 101.
Co więcej, proponuje wykorzystanie lokalizacji telefonu o północy do śledzenia dokładnego miejsca, w którym żyjesz.

7. KORZYSTANIE Z USŁUGI LOKALIZACYJNEJ DO USTALENIA WZORCA:

Ten patent opisuje wykorzystanie lokalizacji Twojego telefonu oraz znajomych w celu określenia, z kim jesteś najbliżej i gdzie spędzasz czas. Sugeruje również monitorowanie telefonu, aby śledzić liczbę godzin snu.

Wiadomo, że firmy zgłaszają patenty, aby pokonać swoich konkurentów w technologiach, nawet jeśli nigdy nie ujrzą one światła dziennego. To samo można zastosować do niektórych patentów Facebooka, ponieważ reklama ma kluczowe znaczenie dla modelu biznesowego firmy.

UWAGA!
Powinniśmy jednak uważać na tak nieokiełznane gromadzenie danych, ponieważ teraz wiemy, że mogą one być wykorzystywane nie tylko do ukierunkowanej reklamy, takiej jak manipulowanie wynikami wyborów i emocjami użytkowników.
___________________

[es]: LAS PATENTES DE FACEBOOK REVELAN SUS ESPELUZNANTES PLANES PARA RECOPILAR MÁS DATOS..

El: 25 de junio de 2018.

Desde 2008, Facebook ha estado bajo fuego debido a sus hábitos de recopilación de datos, y cada vez la empresa afirmó asumir la “responsabilidad de proteger la información del usuario”.
El gigante de las redes sociales prometió que lo haría “mejor”, pero una revisión de las patentes presentadas por Facebook revela cómo la compañía quiere rastrear cada aspecto de nuestras vidas: su identidad, con quién es cercano, estado de la relación, sus opiniones políticas y religiosas. etc.

Según el ‘New York Times‘, Facebooks ha presentado patentes para usar las cámaras frontales para leer las expresiones de los usuarios. Y determinar si
le gustó el contenido que se muestra en su feed.
La empresa también quiere rastrear su socio-
estado económico, cuántas horas de sueño duermes, ¡e incluso ha intentado predecir cuándo morirán tus amigos!

Aunque Facebook dice que sus solicitudes de patentes no necesariamente muestran sus planes de productos futuros, en conjunto exponen el hambre incesante de la empresa por recopilar información personal de los usuarios y encontrar formas de monetizarla.

LAS ESPELUZNANTES PATENTES DE FACEBOOK:

A pesar de las promesas
hecho por; Mark Zuckerberg, estas siete solicitudes de patente de Facebook dan a conocer el planes de la empresa para acumular y explotar su información personal:

1. PERFILES DE SU ESTADO CIVIL:

Esta patente analiza datos como cuántas veces consulta el perfil de otro usuario o la cantidad de personas en su foto de perfil para predecir dónde está involucrado en una relación romántica.

2. CATEGORIZAR SEGÚN SU PERSONALIDAD:

Una patente sugiere el uso de mensajes personales y publicaciones para analizar rasgos de personalidad. La Inteligencia Artificial determinar el alcance de la extroversión, su estabilidad emocional y su proceso de pensamiento, podría dirigirse a usted con noticias o anuncios que podrían gustarle.

3. PREDECIR SU FUTURO:

Esta solicitud de patente propone utilizar su
mensajes y publicaciones junto con transacciones con tarjeta de crédito y ubicación para predecir la ocurrencia de eventos importantes de la vida como nacimiento, muerte o graduación.

4. IDENTIFICACIÓN DE SU CÁMARA: 

Otra patente sugiere analizar fotografías para establecer una “firma” de cámara única, basada en píxeles defectuosos o arañazos en la lente.  Esta firma podría usarse para averiguar quién ha subido imágenes, en las que hizo clic en su dispositivo.

5. ESCUCHÁNDOTE A ESCONDIDAS:

Este tiene como objetivo usar el micrófono del teléfono, escuchar sus conversaciones privadas e identificar qué programas de televisión ve y qué anuncios silencia.

6. SEGUIMIENTO DE SU RUTINA DIARIA: 

Este es realmente espeluznante y peligroso, ya que sugiere monitorear su rutina semanal y notificar a otros usuarios en caso de desviaciones de la rutina: Cómo hacer que el acecho sea fácil 101. Además, propone usar la ubicación del teléfono a la medianoche para rastrear el lugar exacto donde  tu vives.

7. USO DEL SERVICIO DE UBICACIÓN PARA ESTABLECER UN PATRÓN:

Esta patente describe el uso de la ubicación de su teléfono y la de sus amigos para determinar con quién está más cerca y dónde pasa el rato.  Además, sugiere monitorear el teléfono para rastrear cuántas horas de sueño tiene.
Es un hecho conocido que las empresas presentan patentes para vencer a sus competidores en tecnologías, incluso si es posible que nunca vean la luz del día. Lo mismo podría aplicarse a algunas de las patentes de Facebook, ya que la publicidad es crucial para el modelo comercial de la empresa.

¡NOTA!
Debemos tener cuidado con la recopilación de datos tan desenfrenada, ya que ahora sabemos que podría usarse para algo más que publicidad dirigida, como manipular los resultados de las elecciones y las emociones de los usuarios también.
___________________

Tags: / Tagi: / Etiquetas:

#Facebook #News 
#Tech #UserPrivacy
#UserPrivacyBreach
#patent #patents  #patented #surveillance
#PatentedSurveillance
#SurveillancePatents #TrackingData #NoPrivacy #SpyingOnUsers
#SocialMediaControlOnline #TrackLocation
#AccessUsersMicrophone 
#TrackUsersExactLocation 
#ReadUsersPrivateMessages
#AccessUsersCamera
#HumanRightsViolation
#FaceRecognizion 
#InternetUsageSurveillance #FacistSocialMedia
#CommunistSocialMedia
#DictatorTactiques
#ArtificialIntelligence
#Facebooka #Aktualności #patent #patenty #patentowany
#Nadzór #Uzyskaj
#PrywatnośćUżytkownikaNaruszeniePrywatnościUżytkownika
#OpatentowanyNadzór
#PatentyNadzoru 
#KontrolaMediówSpołecznościowychOnline
#UzyskajDostępDoMikrofonuUżytkowników
#ŚledźLokalizację
#ŚledźDokładnąLokalizacjęUżytkowników.
#SzpiegowanieUżytkowników #CzytajPrywatneWiadomościUżytkowników  DostępDoKameryUżytkowników #NaruszeniePrawCzłowieka
#RozpoznawanieTwarzy
#ŚledzenieDanych
#BrakPrywatności
#NadzórKorzystaniaZInternetu
#FaszystowskieMediaSpołecznościowe
#KomunistyczneMediaSpołecznościowe
#TaktykiDyktatora
#SztucznaInteligencja
#Noticias #patentar #patentes #patentado #Vigilancia #EnLínea  #PrivacidadDelUsuario
#ViolaciónDeLaPrivacidadDelUsuario
#VigilanciaPatentada
#PatentesDeVigilancia 
ControlDeRedesSociales 
#AccedaAlMicrófonoDeLosUsuarios
#SeguimientoDeLaUbicación.
#SeguimientoDeLaUbicaciónExactaDeLosUsuarios
#EspiarALosUsuarios
#LeerLosMensajesPrivadosDeLosUsuarios
#AccederALaCámaraDeUsuarios
ViolaciónDeLosDerechosHumanos
#ReconocimientoFacial
#SeguimientoDeDatos
#SinPrivacidad
#VigilanciaDelUsoDeInternet
#RedesSocialesFascistas
#RedesSocialesComunistas #TácticasDelDictador
#InteligenciaArtificial

https://fossbytes.com/facebooks-patents-reveals-creepy-plans-to-collect-more-data/

Article Credits: Manisha Priyadarshini.

NOTE!

[eng]: NOTE!
Artificial Intelligence is developed by humans, and humans are inherently bias.
Artificial Intelligence could take decisions 
influenced by ethnicity, gender, age when hiring or firing, offering loans, or even in criminal proceedings.

MALICIOUS USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COULD THREATEN DIGITAL SECURITY..

EXAMPLE:

China’s Orwellian use of facial technology could be hacked, or manipulated.

Artificial Intelligence can create ‘deep fakes’, which are realistic but fake images or videos which could lead to manipulation of elections.

It can track a person’s online behaviour, and display content accordingly. This could lead to change in opinion, bias, etc on an incredibly large scale.

[pol]:

NOTATKA!

Sztuczna Inteligencja jest rozwijana przez ludzi, a ludzie są z natury stronniczy. Sztuczna Inteligencja może podejmować decyzje pod wpływem pochodzenia etnicznego, płci, wieku przy zatrudnianiu lub zwalnianiu, oferowaniu pożyczek, a nawet w postępowaniu karnym.

ZŁOŚLIWE WYKORZYSTANIE SZTUCZNEJ INTELIGENCJI MOŻE ZAGROZIĆ BEZPIECZEŃSTWU CYFROWEMU..

PRZYKŁAD:

Chińskie orwellowskie użycie technologii twarzy może zostać zhakowane lub zmanipulowane.

Sztuczna Inteligencja może tworzyć „głębokie podróbki”, które są realistycznymi, ale fałszywymi obrazami lub filmami, które mogą prowadzić do manipulacji wyborami.

Może śledzić zachowanie danej osoby w Internecie i odpowiednio wyświetlać treści. Może to prowadzić do zmiany opinii, uprzedzeń itp. na niewiarygodnie dużą skalę.

[es]:

¡NOTA!

La Inteligencia Artificial es desarrollada por humanos, y los humanos son intrínsecamente prejuiciosos. Inteligencia Artificial podría tomar decisiones influidas por la etnia, el género, la edad al contratar o despedir, ofrecer préstamos o incluso en procesos penales.

EL USO MALICIOSO DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL PODRÍA AMENAZAR LA SEGURIDAD DIGITAL..

EJEMPLO:

El uso Orwelliano de China de la tecnología facial podría ser pirateado o manipulado.

La Inteligencia Artificial puede crear “falsificaciones profundas”, que son imágenes o videos realistas pero falsos que podrían conducir a la manipulación de las elecciones.

Puede rastrear el comportamiento en línea de una persona y mostrar contenido en consecuencia. Esto podría provocar cambios de opinión, prejuicios, etc. A una escala increíblemente grande.

“THE REPTILIAN ROOTS OF PEDOPHILIA”..

Watch “The Reptilian Roots of Pedophilia” on YouTube

Below is an article about this topic:

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/reptiles90.htm

FBI REPORT––SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE

From the same FBI unit depicted in the movie Silence of the Lambs this FBI Behavioral Science Unit Report into Satanic Ritual Abuse is objective and revealing. Cultwatch recommends that any law enforcement officer considering acting against someone accused of Satanic Ritual Abuse first read this report in it’s entirety.

1992 FBI REPORT – SATANIC  RITUAL ABUSE 

by Kenneth V. Lanning, Supervisory Special Agent Behavioral Science Unit National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime

INTRODUCTION

Since 1981 I have been assigned to the Behavioral Science Unit at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia, and have specialized in studying all aspects of the sexual victimization of children. The FBI Behavioral Science Unit provides assistance to criminal justice professionals in the United States and foreign countries. It attempts to develop practical applications of the behavioral sciences to the criminal justice system. As a result of training and research conducted by the Unit and its successes in analyzing violent crime, many professionals contact the Behavioral Science Unit for assistance and guidance in dealing with violent crime, especially those cases considered different, unusual, or bizarre. This service is provided at no cost and is not limited to crimes under the investigative jurisdiction of the FBI.

In 1983 and 1984, when I first began to hear stories of what sounded like satanic or occult activity in connection with allegations of sexual victimization of children (allegations that have come to be referred to most often as “ritual” child abuse,) I tended to believe them. I had been dealing with bizarre, deviant behavior for many years and had long since realized that almost anything is possible. Just when you think that you have heard it all, along comes another strange case.

The idea that there are a few cunning, secretive individuals in positions of power somewhere in this country regularly killing a few people as part of some satanic ritual or ceremony and getting away with it is certainly within the realm of possibility. But the number of alleged cases began to grow and grow. We now have hundreds of victims alleging that thousands of offenders are abusing and even murdering tens of thousands of people as part of organized satanic cults, and there is little or no corroborative evidence. The very reason many “experts” cite for believing these allegations (i.e. many victims, who never met each other, reporting the same events,) is the primary reason I began to question at least some aspects of these allegations.

I have devoted more than seven years part-time, and eleven years full-time, of my professional life to researching, training, and consulting in the area of the sexual victimization of children. The issues of child sexual abuse and exploitation are a big part of my professional life’s work. I have no reason to deny their existence or nature. In fact I have done everything I can to make people more aware of the problem. Some have even blamed me for helping to create the hysteria that has led to these bizarre allegations. I can accept no outside income and am paid the same salary by the FBI whether or not children are abused and exploited – and whether the number is one or one million. As someone deeply concerned about and professionally committed to the issue, I did not lightly question the allegations of hundreds of victims child sexual abuse and exploitation.

In response to accusations by a few that I am a “satanist” who has infiltrated the FBI to facilitate cover-up, how does anyone (or should anyone have to) disprove such allegations? Although reluctant to dignify such absurd accusations with a reply, all I can say to those who have made such allegations that they are wrong and to those who heard such allegations is to carefully consider the source.

The reason I have taken the position I have is not because I support or believe in “satanism”, but because I sincerely believe that my approach is the proper and most effective investigative strategy. I believe that my approach is in the best interest of victims of child sexual abuse. It would have been easy to sit back, as many have, and say nothing publicly about this controversy. I have spoken out and published on this issue because I am concerned about the credibility of the child sexual abuse issue and outraged that, in some cases, individuals are getting away with molesting children because we can’t prove they are satanic devil worshippers who engage in brainwashing, human sacrifice, and cannibalism as part of a large conspiracy.

There are many valid perspectives from which to assess and evaluate victim allegations of sex abuse and exploitation. Parents may choose to believe simply because their children make the claims. The level of proof necessary may be minimal because the consequences of believing are within the family. One parent correctly told me, “I believe what my child needs me to believe”.

Therapists may choose to believe simply because their professional assessment is that their patient believes the victimization and describes it so vividly. The level of proof necessary may be no more than therapeutic evaluation because the consequences are between therapist and patient. No independent corroboration may be required.

A social worker must have more real, tangible evidence of abuse in order to take protective action and initiate legal proceedings. The level of proof necessary must be higher because the consequences (denial of visitation, foster care) are greater.

The law enforcement officer deals with the criminal justice system. The levels of proof necessary are reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and beyond a reasonable doubt because the consequences (criminal investigation, search and seizure, arrest, incarceration) are so great. This discussion will focus primarily on the criminal justice system and the law enforcement perspective. The level of proof necessary for taking action on allegations of criminal acts must be more than simply the victim alleged it and it is possible. This in no way denies the validity and importance of the parental, therapeutic, social welfare, or any other perspective of these allegations.

When, however, therapists and other professionals begin to conduct training, publish articles, and communicate through the media, the consequences become greater, and therefore the level of proof must be greater. The amount of corroboration necessary to act upon allegations of abuse is dependent upon the consequences of such action. We need to be concerned about the distribution and publication of unsubstantiated allegations of bizarre sexual abuse. Information needs to be disseminated to encourage communication and research about the phenomena. The risks, however, of intervenor and victim “contagion” and public hysteria are potential negative aspects of such dissemination. Because of the highly emotional and religious nature of this topic, there is a greater possibility that the spreading of information will result in a kind of self- fulfilling prophesy.

If such extreme allegations are going to be disseminated to the general public, they must be presented in the context of being assessed and evaluated, at least, from the professional perspective of the disseminator and, at best, also from the professional perspective of relevant others. This is what I will attempt to do in this discussion. The assessment and evaluation of such allegations are areas where law enforcement, mental health, and other professionals (anthropologists, folklorists, sociologists, historians, engineers, surgeons, etc.) may be of some assistance to each other in validating these cases individually and in general.

HISTORICAL OVERVIEW

In order to attempt to deal with extreme allegations of what constitute child sex rings, it is important to have an historical perspective of society’s attitudes about child sexual abuse. I will provide a brief synopsis of recent attitudes in the United States here, but those desiring more detailed information about such societal attitudes, particularly in other cultures and in the more distant past, should refer to Florence Rush’s book _The Best Kept Secret: Sexual Abuse of Children_ (1980) and Sander J. Breiner’s book _Slaughter of the Innocents_ (1990.)

Society’s attitude about child sexual abuse and exploitation can be summed up in one word: denial. Most people do not want to hear about it and would prefer to pretend that child sexual victimization just does not occur. Today, however, it is difficult to pretend that it does not happen. Stories and reports about child sexual victimization are daily occurrences.

It is important for professionals dealing with child sexual abuse to recognize and learn to manage this denial of a serious problem. Professionals must overcome the denial and encourage society to deal with, report, and prevent sexual victimization of children.

Some professionals, however, in their zeal to make American society more aware of this victimization, tend to exaggerate the problem. Presentations and literature with poorly documented or misleading claims about one in three children being sexually molested, the $5 billion child pornography industry, child slavery rings, and 50,000 stranger-abducted children are not uncommon. The problem is bad enough; it is not necessary to exaggerate it. Professionals should cite reputable and scientific studies and note the sources of information. If they do not, when the exaggerations and distortions are discovered, their credibility and the credibility of the issue are lost.

“STRANGER DANGER” 

During the 1950s and 1960s the primary focus in the literature and discussions on sexual abuse of children was on “stranger danger” – the dirty old man in the wrinkled raincoat. If one could not deny the existence of child sexual abuse, one described victimization in simplistic terms of good and evil. The “stranger danger” approach to preventing child sexual abuse is clear-cut. We immediately know who the good guys and bad guys are and what they look like.

The FBI distributed a poster that epitomized this attitude. It showed a man, with his hat pulled down, hiding behind a tree with a bag of candy in his hands. He was waiting for a sweet little girl walking home from school alone. At the top it read: “Boys and Girls, color the page, memorize the rules.” At the bottom it read: “For your protection, remember to turn down gifts from strangers, and refuse rides offered by strangers.” The poster clearly contrasts the evil of the offender with the goodness of the child victim.

The myth of the child molester as the dirty old man in the wrinkled raincoat is now being reevaluated, based on what we now know about the kinds of people who victimize children. The fact is a child molester can look like anyone else and even be someone we know and like.

There is another myth that is still with us and is far less likely to be discussed. This is the myth of the child victim as a completely innocent little girl walking down the street minding her own business. It may be more important to dispel this myth than the myth of the evil offender, especially when talking about the sexual exploitation of children and child sex rings. Child victims can be boys as well as girls, and not all victims are little “angels”.

Society seems to have a problem dealing with any sexual abuse case in which the offender is not completely “bad” or the victim is not completely “good.” Child victims who, for example, simply behave like human beings and respond to the attention and affection of offenders by voluntarily and repeatedly returning to the offender’s home are troubling. It confuses us to see the victims in child pornography giggling or laughing. At professional conferences on child sexual abuse, child prostitution is almost never discussed. It is the form of sexual victimization of children most unlike the stereotype of the innocent girl victim. Child prostitutes, by definition, participate in and often initiate their victimization.

Furthermore child prostitutes and the participants in child sex rings are frequently boys. One therapist recently told me that a researcher’s data on child molestation were misleading because many of the child victims in question were child prostitutes. This implies that child prostitutes are not “real” child victims. In a survey by the _Los Angeles Times_, only 37 percent of those responding thought that child prostitution constituted child sexual abuse (Timnik, 1985.) Whether or not it seems fair, when adults and children have sex, the child is always the victim.

INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE

During the 1970s, primarily as a result of the women’s movement, society began to learn more about the sexual victimization of children. We began to realize that most children are sexually molested by someone they know who is usually a relative – a father, step-father, uncle, grandfather, older brother, or even a female relative. Some mitigate the difficulty of accepting this by adopting the view that only members of socio-economic groups other than theirs engage in such behavior.

It quickly became apparent that warnings about not taking gifts from strangers were not good enough to prevent child sexual abuse. Consequently, we began to develop prevention programs based on more complex concepts, such as good touching and bad touching. the “yucky” feeling, and the child’s right to say no. These are not the kinds of things you can easily and effectively communicate in fifty minutes to hundreds of kids packed into a school auditorium. These are very difficult issues, and programs must he carefully developed and evaluated.

In the late 1970s child sexual abuse became almost synonymous with incest, and incest meant father-daughter sexual relations. Therefore, the focus of child sexual abuse intervention became father-daughter incest. Even today, the vast majority of training materials, articles, and books on this topic refer to child sexual abuse only in terms of intrafamilial father-daughter incest.

Incest is, in fact, sexual relations between individuals of any age too closely related to marry. It need not necessarily involve an adult and a child, and it goes beyond child sexual abuse. But more importantly child sexual abuse goes beyond father-daughter incest. Intrafamilial incest between an adult and child may be the most common form of child sexual abuse, but it is not the only form.

The progress of the 1970s in recognizing that child sexual abuse was not simply a result of “stranger danger” was an important breakthrough in dealing with society’s denial. The battle, however, is not over. The persistent voice of society luring us back to the more simple concept of “stranger danger” may never go away. It is the voice of denial.

RETURN TO “STRANGER DANGER” 

In the early 1980s the issue of missing children rose to prominence and was focused primarily on the stranger abduction of little children. Runaways, throwaways, noncustodial abductions, nonfamily abductions of teenagers – all major problems within the missing children’s issue – were almost forgotten. People no longer wanted to hear about good touching and bad touching and the child’s right to say “no.” They wanted to be told, in thirty minutes or less, how they could protect their children from abduction by strangers. We were back to the horrible but simple and clear-cut concept of “stranger danger”.

In the emotional zeal over the problem of missing children, isolated horror stories and distorted numbers were sometimes used. The American public was led to believe that most of the missing children had been kidnapped by pedophiles – a new term for child molesters. The media, profiteers, and well-intentioned zealots all played big roles in this hype and hysteria over missing children.

THE ACQUAINTANCE MOLESTER

Only recently has society begun to deal openly with a critical piece in the puzzle of child sexual abuse – acquaintance molestation. This seems to be the most difficult aspect of the problem for us to face. People seem more willing to accept a father or stepfather, particularly one from another socio-economic group, as a child molester than a parish priest, a next-door neighbor, a police officer, a pediatrician, an FBI agent, or a Scout leader. The acquaintance molester, by definition, is one of us. These kinds of molesters have always existed, but our society has not been willing to accept that fact.

Sadly, one of the main reasons that the criminal justice system and the public were forced to confront the problem of acquaintance molestation was the preponderance of lawsuits arising from the negligence of many institutions.

One of the unfortunate outcomes of society’s preference for the “stranger danger” concept is what I call “say no, yell, and tell” guilt. This is the result of prevention programs that tell potential child victims to avoid sexual abuse by saying no, yelling, and telling. This might work with the stranger hiding behind a tree. Adolescent boys seduced by a Scout leader or children who actively participate in their victimization often feel guilty and blame themselves because they did not do what they were “supposed” to do. They may feel a need to describe their victimization in more socially acceptable but sometimes inaccurate ways that relieve them of this guilt.

While American society has become increasingly more aware of the problem of the acquaintance molester and related problems such as child pornography, the voice calling us back to “stranger danger” still persists.

SATANISM: A NEW FORM OF “STRANGER”

In today’s version of “stranger danger,” it is the satanic devil worshipers who are snatching and victimizing the children. Many who warned us in the early 1980s about pedophiles snatching fifty thousand kids a year now contend they were wrong only about who was doing the kidnapping, not about the number abducted. This is again the desire for the simple and clear-cut explanation for a complex problem.

For those who know anything about criminology, one of the oldest theories of crime is demonology: The devil makes you do it. This makes it even easier to deal with the child molester who is the “pillar of the community”. It is not his fault; it is not our fault. There is no way we could have known; the devil made him do it. This explanation has tremendous appeal because, like “stranger danger”, it presents the clear-cut, black-and-white struggle between good and evil as the explanation for child abduction, exploitation, and abuse.

In regard to satanic “ritual” abuse, today we may not be where we were with incest in the 1960s, but where we were with missing children in the early 1980s. The best data now available (the 1990 _National Incidence Studies on Missing, Abducted, Runaway, and Thrownaway Children in America_) estimate the number of stereotypical child abductions at between 200 and 300 a year, and the number of stranger abduction homicides of children at between 43 and 147 a year. Approximately half of the abducted children are teenagers. Today’s facts are significantly different from yesterday’s perceptions, and those who exaggerated the problem, however well-intentioned, have lost credibility and damaged the reality of the problem.

LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING

The belief that there is a connection between satanism and crime is certainly not new. As previously stated, one of the oldest theories concerning the causes of crime is demonology. Fear of satanic or occult activity has peaked from time to time throughout history. Concern in the late 1970s focused primarily on “unexplained” deaths and mutilations of animals, and in recent years has focused on child sexual abuse and the alleged human sacrifice of missing children. In 1999 it will probably focus on the impending “end of the world”.

Today satanism and a wide variety of other terms are used interchangeably in reference to certain crimes. This discussion will analyze the nature of “satanic, occult, ritualistic” crime primarily as it pertains to the abuse of children and focus on appropriate law enforcement responses to it. Recently a flood of law enforcement seminars and conferences have dealt with satanic and ritualistic crime. These training conferences have various titles, such as “Occult in Crime”, “Satanic Cults”, ‘Ritualistic Crime Seminar”, “Satanic Influences in Homicide,” “Occult Crimes, Satanism and Teen Suicide,” and “Ritualistic Abuse of Children.”

The typical conference runs from one to three days, and many of them include the same presenters and instructors. A wide variety of topics are usually discussed during this training either as individual presentations by different instructors or grouped together by one or more instructors.

TYPICAL TOPICS COVERED

INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

Historical overview of satanism, witchcraft, and paganism from ancient to modern times. Nature and influence of fantasy role-playing games, such as “Dungeons and Dragons”. Lyrics, symbolism, and influence of rock and roll, Heavy Metal, and Black Metal music. Teenage “stoner” gangs, their symbols, and their vandalism. Teenage suicide by adolescents dabbling in the occult. Crimes committed by self-styled satanic practitioners, including grave and church desecrations and robberies, animal mutilations, and even murders. Ritualistic abuse of children as part of bizarre ceremonies and human sacrifices. Organized, Traditional, or Multigenerational satanic groups involved in organized conspiracies, such as taking over day care centers, infiltrating police departments, and trafficking in human sacrifice victims. The “Big Conspiracy” theory, which implies that satanists are responsible for such things as Adolph Hitler, World War II, abortion, illegal drugs, pornography, Watergate, and Irangate, and have infiltrated the Department of Justice, the Pentagon, and the White House.

During the conferences, these nine areas are linked together through the liberal use of the word “satanism” and some common symbolism (pentagrams, 666, demons, etc.) The implication often is that all are part of a continuum of behavior, a single problem or some common conspiracy. The distinctions among the different areas are blurred even if occasionally a presenter tries to make them. The information presented is a mixture of fact, theory, opinion, fantasy, and paranoia, and because some of it can be proven or corroborated (symbols on rock albums, graffiti on walls, desecration of cemeteries, vandalism, etc.,) the implication is that it is all true and documented. Material produced by religious organizations, photocopies and slides of newspaper articles, and videotapes of tabloid television programs are used to supplement the training and are presented as “evidence” of the existence and nature of the problem.

All of this is complicated by the fact that almost any discussion of satanism and the occult is interpreted in the light of the religious beliefs of those in the audience. Faith, not logic and reason, governs the religious beliefs of most people. As a result, some normally skeptical law enforcement officers accept the information disseminated at these conferences without critically evaluating it or questioning the sources.

Officers who do not normally depend on church groups for law enforcement criminal intelligence, who know that media accounts of their own cases are notoriously inaccurate, and who scoff at and joke about tabloid television accounts of bizarre behavior suddenly embrace such material when presented in the context of satanic activity. Individuals not in law enforcement seem even more likely to do so. Other disciplines, especially therapists, have also conducted training conferences on the characteristics and identification of “ritual” child abuse. Nothing said at such conferences will change the religious beliefs of those in attendance. Such conferences illustrate the highly emotional nature of and the ambiguity and wide variety of terms involved in this issue.

DEFINITIONS

The words “satanic”, “occult”, and “ritual” are often used interchangeably. It is difficult to define “satanism” precisely. No attempt will be made to do so here. However, it is important to realize that, for some people, any religious belief system other than their own is “satanic”. The Ayatollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein referred to the United States as the “Great Satan”. In the British Parliament a Protestant leader called the Pope the Antichrist. In a book titled _Prepare For War_ (1987,) Rebecca Brown, M.D. has a chapter entitled “Is Roman Catholicism Witchcraft?” Dr. Brown also lists among the “doorways” to satanic power and/or demon infestation the following: fortune tellers, horoscopes, fraternity oaths, vegetarianism, yoga, self-hypnosis, relaxation tapes, acupuncture, biofeedback, fantasy role-playing games, adultery, homosexuality, pornography, judo, karate, and rock music. Dr. Brown states that rock music “was a carefully masterminded plan by none other than Satan himself” (p. 84.) The ideas expressed in this book may seem extreme and even humorous. This book, however, has been recommended as a serious reference in law enforcement training material on this topic. In books, lectures, handout material, and conversations, I have heard all of the following referred to as satanism:

 

— Church of Satan

— Ordo Templi Orientis

— Temple of Set

— Demonology

— Witchcraft

— Occult

— Paganism

— Santeria

— Voodoo

— Rosicrucians

— Freemasonry

— Knights Templar

— Stoner Gangs

— Heavy Metal Music

— Rock Music

— KKK

— Nazis

— Skinheads

— Scientology

— Unification Church

— The Way

— Hare Krishna

— Rajneesh

— Religious Cults

— New Age

— Astrology

— Channeling

— Transcendental Meditation

— Holistic Medicine

— Buddhism

— Hinduism

— Mormonism

— Islam

— Orthodox Church — Roman Catholicism

 

At law enforcement training conferences, it is witchcraft, santeria, paganism, and the occult that are most often referred to as forms of satanism. It may be a matter of definition, but these things are not necessarily the same as traditional satanism. The worship of lunar goddesses and nature and the practice of fertility rituals are not satanism. Santeria is a combination of 17th century Roman Catholicism and African paganism.

Occult means simply “hidden”. All unreported or unsolved crimes might be regarded as occult, but in this context the term refers to the action or influence of supernatural powers, some secret knowledge of them, or an interest in paranormal phenomena, and does not imply satanism, evil, wrongdoing, or crime. Indeed, historically, the principal crimes deserving of consideration as “occult crimes” are the frauds perpetrated by faith healers, fortune tellers and “psychics” who for a fee claim cures, arrange visitations with dead loved ones, and commit other financial crimes against the gullible.

Many individuals define satanism from a totally Christian perspective, using this word to describe the power of evil in the world. With this definition, any crimes, especially those which are particularly bizarre, repulsive, or cruel, can be viewed as satanic in nature. Yet it is just as difficult to precisely define satanism as it is to precisely define Christianity or any complex spiritual belief system.

WHAT IS RITUAL?

The biggest confusion is over the word “ritual.” During training conferences on this topic, ritual almost always comes to mean “satanic” or at least “spiritual”. “Ritual” can refer to a prescribed religious ceremony, but in its broader meaning refers to any customarily-repeated act or series of acts. The need to repeat these acts can be cultural, sexual, or psychological as well as spiritual.

Cultural rituals could include such things as what a family eats on Thanksgiving Day, or when and how presents are opened at Christmas. The initiation ceremonies of fraternities, sororities, gangs, and other social clubs are other examples of cultural rituals.

Since 1972 I have lectured about sexual ritual, which is nothing more than repeatedly engaging in an act or series of acts in a certain manner because of a sexual need. In order to become aroused and/or gratified, a person must engage in the act in a certain way. This sexual ritual can include such things as the physical characteristics, age, or gender of the victim, the particular sequence of acts, the bringing or taking of specific objects, and the use of certain words or phrases. This is more than the concept of M.O. (Method of Operation) known to most police officers. M.O. is something done by an offender because it works. Sexual ritual is something done by an offender because of a need. Deviant acts, such as urinating on, defecating on, or even eviscerating a victim, are far more likely to be the result of sexual ritual than religious or “satanic” ritual.

>From a criminal investigative perspective, two other forms of ritualism must be recognized. The _Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders_ (DSM-III-R) (APA, 1987) defines “Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder” as “repetitive, purposeful, and intentional behaviors that are performed in response to an obsession, or according to certain rules or in a stereotyped fashion” (p. 247.) Such compulsive behavior frequently involves rituals. Although such behavior usually involves noncriminal activity such as excessive hand washing or checking that doors are locked, occasionally compulsive ritualism can be part of criminal activity.

Certain gamblers or firesetters, for example, are thought by some authorities to be motivated in part through such compulsions. Ritual can also stem from psychotic hallucinations and delusions. A crime can be committed in a precise manner because a voice told the offender to do it that way or because a divine mission required it.

To make this more confusing, cultural, religious, sexual, and psychological ritual can overlap. Some psychotic people are preoccupied with religious delusions and hear the voice of God or Satan telling them to do things of a religious nature. Offenders who feel little, if any, guilt over their crimes may need little justification for their antisocial behavior. As human beings, however, they may have fears, concerns, and anxiety over getting away with their criminal acts. It is difficult to pray to God for success in doing things that are against His Commandments.

A negative spiritual belief system may fulfill their human need for assistance from and belief in a greater power or to deal with their superstitions. Compulsive ritualism (e.g., excessive cleanliness or fear of disease) can be introduced into sexual behavior. Even many “normal” people have a need for order and predictability and therefore may engage in family or work rituals. Under stress or in times of change, this need for order and ritual may increase.

Ritual crime may fulfill the cultural, spiritual, sexual, and psychological needs of an offender. Crimes may be ritualistically motivated or may have ritualistic elements. The ritual behavior may also fulfill basic criminal needs to manipulate victims, get rid of rivals, send a message to enemies, and intimidate co-conspirators. The leaders of a group may want to play upon the beliefs and superstitions of those around them and try to convince accomplices and enemies that they, the leaders, have special or “supernatural” powers.

The important point for the criminal investigator is to realize that most ritualistic criminal behavior is not motivated simply by satanic or any religious ceremonies. At some conferences, presenters have attempted to make an issue of distinguishing between “ritual,” “ritualized,” and “ritualistic” abuse of children. These subtle distinctions, however, seem to be of no significant value to the criminal investigator.

WHAT IS “RITUAL” CHILD ABUSE?

I cannot define “ritual child abuse” precisely and prefer not to use the term. I am frequently forced to use it (as throughout this discussion) so that people will have some idea what I am discussing. Use of the term, however, is confusing, misleading, and counterproductive. The newer term “satanic ritual abuse” (abbreviated “SRA”) is even worse. Certain observations, however, are important for investigative understanding. Most people today use the term to refer to abuse of children that is part of some evil spiritual belief system, which almost by definition must be satanic.

Dr. Lawrence Pazder, coauthor of _Michelle Remembers_, defines “ritualized abuse of children” as “repeated physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual assaults combined with a systematic use of symbols and secret ceremonies designed to turn a child against itself, family, society, and God” (presentation, Richmond, Va., May 7,1987.) He also states that “the sexual assault has ritualistic meaning and is not for sexual gratification”. 

This definition may have value for academics, sociologists, and therapists, but it creates potential problems for law enforcement. Certain acts engaged in with children (i.e. kissing, touching, appearing naked, etc.) may be criminal if performed for sexual gratification. If the ritualistic acts were in fact performed for spiritual indoctrination, potential prosecution can be jeopardized, particularly if the acts can be defended as constitutionally protected religious expression. The mutilation of a baby’s genitals for sadistic sexual pleasure is a crime. The circumcision of a baby’s genitals for religious reasons is most likely not a crime. The intent of the acts is important for criminal prosecution.

Not all spiritually motivated ritualistic activity is satanic. Santeria, witchcraft, voodoo, and most religious cults are not satanism. In fact, most spiritually- or religiously-based abuse of children has nothing to do with satanism. Most child abuse that could be termed “ritualistic” by various definitions is more likely to be physical and psychological rather than sexual in nature. If a distinction needs to be made between satanic and nonsatanic child abuse, the indicators for that distinction must be related to specific satanic symbols, artifacts, or doctrine rather than the mere presence of any ritualistic element.

Not all such ritualistic activity with a child is a crime. Almost all parents with religious beliefs indoctrinate their children into that belief system. Is male circumcision for religious reasons child abuse? Is the religious circumcision of females child abuse? Does having a child kneel on a hard floor reciting the rosary constitute child abuse? Does having a child chant a satanic prayer or attend a black mass constitute child abuse? Does a religious belief in corporal punishment constitute child abuse? Does group care of children in a commune or cult constitute child abuse? Does the fact that any acts in question were performed with parental permission affect the nature of the crime? Many ritualistic acts, whether satanic or not, are simply not crimes. To open the Pandora’s box of labeling child abuse as “ritualistic” simply because it involves a spiritual belief system means to apply the definition to all acts by all spiritual belief systems. The day may come when many in the forefront of concern about ritual abuse will regret they opened the box.

When a victim describes and investigation corroborates what sounds like ritualistic activity, several possibilities must be considered. The ritualistic activity may be part of the excessive religiosity of mentally disturbed, even psychotic offenders. It may be a misunderstood part of sexual ritual. The ritualistic activity may be incidental to any real abuse. The offender may be involved in ritualistic activity with a child and also may be abusing a child, but one may have little or nothing to do with the other.

The offender may be deliberately engaging in ritualistic activity with a child as part of child abuse and exploitation. The motivation, however, may be not to indoctrinate the child into a belief system, but to lower the inhibitions of, control, manipulate, and/or confuse the child. In all the turmoil over this issue, it would be very effective strategy for any child molester deliberately to introduce ritualistic elements into his crime in order to confuse the child and therefore the criminal justice system. This would, however, make the activity M.O. and not ritual.

The ritualistic activity and the child abuse may be integral parts of some spiritual belief system. In that case the greatest risk is to the children of the practitioners. But this is true of all cults and religions, not just satanic cults. A high potential of abuse exists for any children raised in a group isolated from the mainstream of society, especially if the group has a charismatic leader whose orders are unquestioned and blindly obeyed by the members. Sex, money, and power are often the main motivations of the leaders of such cults.

WHAT MAKES A CRIME SATANIC, OCCULT, OR RITUALISTIC?

Some would answer that it is the offender’s spiritual beliefs or membership in a cult or church. If that is the criterion, why not label the crimes committed by Protestants, Catholics, and Jews in the same way? Are the atrocities of Jim Jones in Guyana Christian crimes?

Some would answer that it is the presence of certain symbols in the possession or home of the perpetrator. What does it mean then to find a crucifix, Bible, or rosary in the possession or home of a bank robber, embezzler, child molester, or murderer? If different criminals possess the same symbols, are they necessarily part of one big “conspiracy”?

Others would answer that it is the presence of certain symbols such as pentagrams, inverted crosses, and 666 at the crime scene. What does it mean then to find a cross spray painted on a wall or carved into the body of a victim? What does it mean for a perpetrator, as in one recent case profiled by my Unit, to leave a Bible tied to his murder victim? What about the possibility that an offender deliberately left such symbols to make it look like a “satanic” crime?

Some would argue that it is the bizarreness or cruelness of the crime: body mutilation, amputation, drinking of blood, eating of flesh, use of urine or feces. Does this mean that all individuals involved in lust murder, sadism, vampirism, cannibalism, urophilia, and coprophilia are satanists or occult practitioners? What does this say about the bizarre crimes of psychotic killers such as Ed Gein or Richard Trenton Chase, both of whom mutilated their victims as part of their psychotic delusions? Can a crime that is not sexually deviant, bizarre, or exceptionally violent be satanic? Can white collar crime be satanic?

A few might even answer that it is the fact that the crime was committed on a date with satanic or occult significance (Halloween, May Eve, etc.) or the fact that the perpetrator claims that Satan told him to commit the crime. What does this mean for crimes committed on Thanksgiving or Christmas? What does this say about crimes committed by perpetrators who claim that God or Jesus told them to do it? One note of interest is the fact that in handout and reference material I have collected, the number of dates with satanic or occult significance ranges from 8 to 110.

This is compounded by the fact that it is sometimes stated that satanists can celebrate these holidays on several days on either side of the official date or that the birthdays of practitioners can also be holidays. The exact names and exact dates of the holidays and the meaning of symbols listed may also vary depending on who prepared the material. The handout material is often distributed without identifying the author or documenting the original source of the information. It is then frequently photocopied by attendees and passed on to other police officers with no one really knowing its validity or origin.

Most, however, would probably answer that what makes a crime satanic, occult, or ritualistic is the motivation for the crime. It is a crime that is spiritually motivated by a religious belief system. How then do we label the following true crimes?

Parents defy a court order and send their children to an unlicensed Christian school. Parents refuse to send their children to any school because they are waiting for the second coming of Christ. Parents beat their child to death because he or she will not follow their Christian belief. Parents violate child labor laws because they believe the Bible requires such work. Individuals bomb an abortion clinic or kidnap the doctor because their religious belief system says abortion is murder. A child molester reads the Bible to his victims in order to justify his sex acts with them. Parents refuse life-saving medical treatment for a child because of their religious beliefs. Parents starve and beat their child to death because their minister said the child was possessed by demonic spirits.

Some people would argue that the Christians who committed the above crimes misunderstood and distorted their religion while satanists who commit crimes are following theirs. But who decides what constitutes a misinterpretation of a religious belief system? The individuals who committed the above-described crimes, however misguided, believed that they were following their religion as they understood it. Religion was and is used to justify such social behavior as the Crusades, the Inquisition, Apartheid, segregation, and recent violence in Northern Ireland, India, Lebanon and Nigeria.

Who decides exactly what “satanists” believe? In this country, we cannot even agree on what Christians believe. At many law enforcement conferences The _Satanic Bible_ is used for this, and it is often contrasted or compared with the Judeo-Christian Bible. The _Satanic Bible_ is, in essence, a short paperback book written by one man, Anton LaVey, in 1969.

To compare it to a book written by multiple authors over a period of thousands of years is ridiculous, even ignoring the possibility of Divine revelation in the Bible. What satanists believe certainly isn’t limited to other people’s interpretation of a few books. More importantly it is subject to some degree of interpretation by individual believers just as Christianity is. Many admitted “satanists” claim they do not even believe in God, the devil, or any supreme deity. The criminal behavior of one person claiming belief in a religion does not necessarily imply guilt or blame to others sharing that belief. In addition, simply claiming membership in a religion does not necessarily make you a member.

The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus, Mohammed, and other mainstream religion than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people, including myself, don’t like that statement, but the truth of it is undeniable.

Although defining a crime as satanic, occult, or ritualistic would probably involve a combination of the criteria set forth above, I have been unable to clearly define such a crime. Each potential definition presents a different set of problems when measured against an objective, rational, and constitutional perspective. In a crime with multiple subjects, each offender may have a different motivation for the same crime. Whose motivation determines the label for the crime? It is difficult to count or track something you cannot even define.

I have discovered, however, that the facts of so-called “satanic crimes” are often significantly different from what is described at training conferences or in the media. The actual involvement of satanism or the occult in these cases usually turns out to be secondary, insignificant, or nonexistent. Occult or ritual crime surveys done by the states of Michigan (1990) and Virginia (1991) have only confirmed this “discovery.” Some law enforcement officers, unable to find serious “satanic” crime in their communities, assume they are just lucky or vigilant and the serious problems must be in other jurisdictions. The officers in the other jurisdictions, also unable find it, assume the same.

MULTIDIMENSIONAL CHILD SEX RINGS

Sometime in early 1983 I was first contacted by a law enforcement agency for guidance in what was then thought to be an unusual case. The exact date of the contact is unknown because its significance was not recognized at the time. In the months and years that followed, I received more and more inquiries about “these kinds of cases.” The requests for assistance came (and continue to come) from all over the United States. Many of the aspects of these cases varied, but there were also some commonalties. Early on, however, one particularly difficult and potentially significant issue began to emerge.

These cases involved and continue to involve unsubstantiated allegations of bizarre activity that are difficult either to prove or disprove. Many of the unsubstantiated allegations, however, do not seem to have occurred or even seem to be possible. These cases seem to call into question the credibility of victims of child sexual abuse and exploitation. These are the most polarizing, frustrating, and baffling cases I have encountered in more than 18 years of studying the criminal aspects of deviant sexual behavior. I privately sought answers, but said nothing publicly about those cases until 1985.

In October 1984 the problems in investigating and prosecuting one of these cases in Jordan, Minnesota became publicly known. In February 1985, at the FBI Academy, the FBI sponsored and I coordinated the first national seminar held to study “these kinds of cases.” Later in 1985, similar conferences sponsored by other organizations were held in Washington, D.C.; Sacramento, California; and Chicago, Illinois. These cases have also been discussed at many recent regional and national conferences dealing with the sexual victimization of children and Multiple Personality Disorder. Few answers have come from these conferences. I continue to be contacted on these cases on a regular basis. Inquiries have been received from law enforcement officers, prosecutors, therapists, victims, families of victims, and the media from all over the United States and now foreign countries. I do not claim to understand completely all the dynamics of these cases. I continue to keep an open mind and to search for answers to the questions and solutions to the problems they pose. This discussion is based on my analysis of the several hundred of “these kinds of cases” on which I have consulted since 1983.

DYNAMICS OF CASES

What are “these kinds of cases?” They were and continue to be difficult to define. They all involve allegations of what sounds like child sexual abuse, but with a combination of some atypical dynamics. These cases seem to have the following four dynamics in common: (1) multiple young victims, (2) multiple offenders, (3) fear as the controlling tactic, and (4) bizarre or ritualistic activity.

— (1) MULTIPLE YOUNG VICTIMS

In almost all the cases the sexual abuse was alleged to have taken place or at least begun when the victims were between the ages of birth and six. This very young age may be an important key to understanding these cases. In addition the victims all described multiple children being abused. The numbers ranged from three or four to as many as several hundred victims.

— (2) MULTIPLE OFFENDERS

In almost all the cases the victims reported numerous offenders. The numbers ranged from two or three all the way up to dozens of offenders. In one recent case the victims alleged 400-500 offenders were involved. Interestingly many of the offenders (perhaps as many as 40-50 percent) were reported to be females. The multiple offenders were often family members and were described as being part of a cult, occult, or satanic group.

— (3) FEAR AS CONTROLLING TACTIC

Child molesters in general are able to maintain control and ensure the secrecy of their victims in a variety of ways. These include attention and affection, coercion, blackmail, embarrassment, threats, and violence. In almost all of these cases I have studied, the victims described being frightened and reported threats against themselves, their families, their friends, and even their pets. They reported witnessing acts of violence perpetrated to reinforce this fear. It is my belief that this fear and the traumatic memory of the events may be another key to understanding many of these cases.

— (4) BIZARRE OR RITUALISTIC ACTIVITY

This is the most difficult dynamic of these cases to describe. “Bizarre” is a relative term. Is the use of urine or feces in sexual activity bizarre, or is it a well-documented aspect of sexual deviancy, or is it part of established satanic rituals? As previously discussed, the ritualistic aspect is even more difficult to define. How do you distinguish acts performed in a precise manner to enhance or allow sexual arousal from those acts that fulfill spiritual needs or comply with “religious” ceremonies? Victims in these cases report ceremonies, chanting, robes and costumes, drugs, use of urine and feces, animal sacrifice, torture, abduction, mutilation, murder, and even cannibalism and vampirism. All things considered, the word “bizarre” is probably preferable to the word “ritual” to describe this activity.

When I was contacted on these cases, it was very common for a prosecutor or investigator to say that the alleged victims have been evaluated by an “expert” who will stake his or her professional reputation on the fact that the victims are telling the “truth.” When asked how many cases this expert had previously evaluated involving these four dynamics, the answer was always the same: none! The experts usually had only dealt with one-on-one intrafamilial sexual abuse cases. Recently an even more disturbing trend has developed. More and more of the victims have been identified or evaluated by experts who have been trained to identify and specialize in satanic ritual abuse.

CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL CHILD SEX RINGS

As previously stated, a major problem in communicating, training, and researching in this area is the term used to define “these kinds of cases.” Many refer to them as “ritual, ritualistic, or ritualized abuse of children cases” or “satanic ritual abuse (SRA) cases.” Such words carry specialized meanings for many people and might imply that all these cases are connected to occult or satanic activity. If ritual abuse is not necessarily occult or satanic, but is “merely” severe, repeated, prolonged abuse, why use a term that, in the minds of so many, implies such specific motivation?

Others refer to these cases as “multioffender/multivictim cases.” The problem with this term is that most multiple offender and victim cases do not involve the four dynamics discussed above.

For want of a better term, I have decided to refer to “these kinds of cases” as “multidimensional child sex rings.” Right now I seem to be the only one using this term. I am, however, not sure if this is truly a distinct kind of child sex ring case or just a case not properly handled.

Following are the general characteristics of these multidimensional child sex ring cases as contrasted with more common historical child sex ring cases [see my monograph _Child Sex Rings: A Behavioral Analysis] (1989) for a discussion of the characteristics of historical child sex ring cases]. [NOTE: Monograph is available in PDF format through the link given — flr]

— (1) FEMALE OFFENDERS

As many as 40-50 percent of the offenders in these cases are reported to be women. This is in marked contrast to historical child sex rings in which almost all the offenders are men.

— (2) SITUATIONAL MOLESTERS

The offenders appear to be sexually interacting with the child victims for reasons other than a true sexual preference for children. The children are substitute victims, and the abusive activity may have little to do with pedophilia [see my monograph _Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis_ (1987) for a further explanation about types of molesters]. [NOTE: The monograph is available in PDF format through the link offered — flr]

— (3) MALE AND FEMALE VICTIMS

Both boys and girls appear to be targeted, but with an apparent preference for girls. Almost all the adult survivors are female, but day care cases frequently involve male as well as female victims. The most striking characteristic of the victims, however, is their young age (generally birth to six years old when the abuse began.)

— (4) MULTIDIMENSIONAL MOTIVATION

Sexual gratification appears to be only part of the motivation for the “sexual” activity. Many people today argue that the motivation is “spiritual” – possibly part of an occult ceremony. It is my opinion that the motivation may have more to do with anger, hostility, rage and resentment carried out against weak and vulnerable victims. Much of the ritualistic abuse of children may not be sexual in nature. Some of the activity may, in fact, be physical abuse directed at sexually-significant body parts (penis, anus, nipples.) This may also partially explain the large percentage of female offenders. Physical abuse of children by females is well- documented.

— (5) PORNOGRAPHY AND PARAPHERNALIA

Although many of the victims of multidimensional child sex rings claim that pictures and videotapes of the activity were made, no such visual record has been found by law enforcement. In recent years, American law enforcement has seized large amounts of child pornography portraying children in a wide variety of sexual activity and perversions. None of it, however, portrays the kind of bizarre and/or ritualistic activity described by these victims. Perhaps these offenders use and store their pornography and paraphernalia in ways different from preferential child molesters (pedophiles.) This is an area needing additional research and investigation.

— (6) CONTROL THROUGH FEAR

Control through fear may be the overriding characteristic of these cases. Control is maintained by frightening the children. A very young child might not be able to understand the significance of much of the sexual activity but certainly understands fear. The stories that the victims tell may be their perceived versions of severe traumatic memories. They may be the victims of a severely traumatized childhood in which being sexually abused was just one of the many negative events affecting their lives.

SCENARIOS

Multidimensional child sex rings typically emerge from one of four scenarios: (1) adult survivors, (2) day care cases, (3) family/isolated neighborhood cases, and (4) custody/visitation disputes.

— (1) ADULT SURVIVORS

In adult survivor cases, adults of almost any age – nearly always women – are suffering the consequences of a variety of personal problems and failures in their lives (e.g., promiscuity, eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, failed relationships, self- mutilation, unemployment.) As a result of some precipitating stress or crisis, they often seek therapy. They are frequently hypnotized, intentionally or unintentionally, as part of the therapy and are often diagnosed as suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder. Gradually, during the therapy, the adults reveal previously unrecalled memories of early childhood victimization that includes multiple victims and offenders, fear as the controlling tactic, and bizarre or ritualistic activity. Adult survivors may also claim that “cues” from certain events in their recent life “triggered” the previously repressed memories.

The multiple offenders are often described as members of a cult or satanic group. Parents, family members, clergy, civic leaders, police officers (or individuals wearing police uniforms,) and other prominent members of society are frequently described as present at and participating in the exploitation. The alleged bizarre activity often includes insertion of foreign objects, witnessing mutilations, and sexual acts and murders being filmed or photographed. The offenders may allegedly still be harassing or threatening the victims. They report being particularly frightened on certain dates and by certain situations. In several of these cases, women (called “breeders”) claim to have had babies that were turned over for human sacrifice. This type of case is probably best typified by books like _Michelle Remembers_ (Smith & Pazder, 1980,) _Satan’s Underground_ (Stratford, 1988,) and _Satan’s Children_ (Mayer, 1991.)

If and when therapists come to believe the patient or decide the law requires it, the police or FBI are sometimes contacted to conduct an investigation. The therapists may also fear for their safety because they now know the “secret.” The therapists will frequently tell law enforcement that they will stake their professional reputation on the fact that their patient is telling the truth. Some adult survivors go directly to law enforcement. They may also go from place to place in an effort to find therapists or i 

WHY ARE VICTIMS ALLEGING THINGS THAT DO NOT SEEM TO BE TRUE?

Some of what the victims in these cases allege is physically impossible (victim cut up and put back together, offender took the building apart and then rebuilt it); some is possible but improbable (human sacrifice, cannibalism, vampirism ); some is possible and probable (child pornography, clever manipulation of victims); and some is corroborated (medical evidence of vaginal or anal trauma, offender confessions.)

The most significant crimes being alleged that do not seem to be true are the human sacrifice and cannibalism by organized satanic cults. In none of the multidimensional child sex ring cases of which I am aware have bodies of the murder victims been found – in spite of major excavations where the abuse victims claim the bodies were located. The alleged explanations for this include: the offenders moved the bodies after the children left, the bodies were burned in portable high-temperature ovens, the bodies were put in double- decker graves under legitimately buried bodies, a mortician member of the cult disposed of the bodies in a crematorium, the offenders ate the bodies, the offenders used corpses and aborted fetuses, or the power of Satan caused the bodies to disappear.

Not only are no bodies found, but also, more importantly, there is no physical evidence that a murder took place. Many of those not in law enforcement do not understand that, while it is possible to get rid of a body, it is even more difficult to get rid of the physical evidence that a murder took place, especially a human sacrifice involving sex, blood, and mutilation. Such activity would leave behind trace evidence that could be found using modern crime scene processing techniques in spite of extraordinary efforts to clean it up.

The victims of these human sacrifices and murders are alleged to be abducted missing children, runaway and throwaway children, derelicts, and the babies of breeder women. It is interesting to note that many of those espousing these theories are using the long- since-discredited numbers and rhetoric of the missing children hysteria in the early 1980s. Yet “Stranger-Abduction Homicides of Children,” a January 1989 _Juvenile Justice Bulletin_, published by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of the U.S. Department of Justice, reports that researchers now estimate that the number of children kidnapped and murdered by nonfamily members is between 52 and 158 a year and that adolescents 14 to 17 years old account for nearly two-thirds of these victims. These figures are also consistent with the 1990 National Incident Studies previously mentioned.

We live in a very violent society, and yet we have “only” about 23,000 murders a year. Those who accept these stories of mass human sacrifice would have us believe that the satanists and other occult practitioners are murdering more than twice as many people every year in this country as all the other murderers combined.

In addition, in none of the cases of which I am aware has any evidence of a well-organized satanic cult been found. Many of those who accept the stories of organized ritual abuse of children and human sacrifice will tell you that the best evidence they now have is the consistency of stories from all over America. It sounds like a powerful argument. It is interesting to note that, without having met each other, the hundreds of people who claim to have been abducted by aliens from outer space also tell stories and give descriptions of the aliens that are similar to each other. This is not to imply that allegations of child abuse are in the same category as allegations of abduction by aliens from outer space. It is intended only to illustrate that individuals who never met each other can sometimes describe similar events without necessarily having experienced them.

The large number of people telling the same story is, in fact, the biggest reason to doubt these stories. It is simply too difficult for that many people to commit so many horrendous crimes as part of an organized conspiracy. Two or three people murder a couple of children in a few communities as part of a ritual, and nobody finds out? Possible. Thousands of people do the same thing to tens of thousands of victims over many years? Not likely. Hundreds of communities all over America are run by mayors, police departments, and community leaders who are practicing satanists and who regularly murder and eat people? Not likely.

In addition, these community leaders and high-ranking officials also supposedly commit these complex crimes leaving no evidence, and at the same time function as leaders and managers while heavily involved in using illegal drugs. Probably the closest documented example of this type of alleged activity in American history is the Ku Klux Klan, which ironically used Christianity, not satanism, to rationalize its activity but which, as might be expected, was eventually infiltrated by informants and betrayed by its members.

As stated, initially I was inclined to believe the allegations of the victims. But as the cases poured in and the months and years went by, I became more concerned about the lack of physical evidence and corroboration for many of the more serious allegations. With increasing frequency I began to ask the question: “Why are victims alleging things that do not seem to be true?” Many possible answers were considered.

The first possible answer is obvious: clever offenders. The allegations may not seem to be true but they are true. The criminal justice system lacks the knowledge, skill, and motivation to get to the bottom of this crime conspiracy. The perpetrators of this crime conspiracy are clever, cunning individuals using sophisticated mind control and brainwashing techniques to control their victims. Law enforcement does not know how to investigate these cases.

It is technically possible that these allegations of an organized conspiracy involving taking over day care centers, abduction, cannibalism, murder, and human sacrifice might be true. But if they are true, they constitute one of the greatest crime conspiracies in history. Many people do not understand how difficult it is to commit a conspiracy crime involving numerous co-conspirators. One clever and cunning individual has a good chance of getting away with a well- planned interpersonal crime. Bring one partner into the crime and the odds of getting away with it drop considerably. The more people involved in the crime, the harder it is to get away with it. Why? Human nature is the answer. People get angry and jealous. They come to resent the fact that another conspirator is getting “more” than they. They get in trouble and want to make a deal for themselves by informing on others.

If a group of individuals degenerate to the point of engaging in human sacrifice, murder, and cannibalism, that would most likely be the beginning of the end for such a group. The odds are that someone in the group would have a problem with such acts and be unable to maintain the secret.

THE APPEAL OF THE SATANIC “CONSPIRACY THEORY” IS TWOFOLD: 

—- (1) First, it is a simple explanation for a complex problem. Nothing is more simple than “the devil made them do it.” If we do not understand something, we make it the work of some supernatural force. During the Middle Ages, serial killers were thought to be vampires and werewolves, and child sexual abuse was the work of demons taking the form of parents and clergy. Even today, especially for those raised to religiously believe so, satanism offers an explanation as to why “good” people do bad things. It may also help to “explain” unusual, bizarre, and compulsive sexual urges and behavior.

—- (2) Second, the conspiracy theory is a popular one. We find it difficult to believe that one bizarre individual could commit a crime we find so offensive. Conspiracy theories about soldiers missing in action (MIAs,) abductions by UFOs, Elvis Presley sightings, and the assassination of prominent public figures are the focus of much attention in this country. These conspiracy theories and allegations of ritual abuse have the following in common: (1) self-proclaimed experts, (2) tabloid media interest, (3) belief the government is involved in a coverup, and (4) emotionally involved direct and indirect victim/witnesses.

On a recent television program commemorating the one hundredth anniversary of Jack the Ripper, almost fifty percent of the viewing audience who called the polling telephone numbers indicated that they thought the murders were committed as part of a conspiracy involving the British Royal Family. The five experts on the program, however, unanimously agreed the crimes were the work of one disorganized but lucky individual who was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic. In many ways, the murders of Jack the Ripper are similar to those allegedly committed by satanists today.

If your child’s molestation was perpetrated by a sophisticated satanic cult, there is nothing you could have done to prevent it and therefore no reason to feel any guilt. I have been present when parents who believe their children were ritually abused at day care centers have told others that the cults had sensors in the road, lookouts in the air, and informers everywhere; therefore, the usually recommended advice of unannounced visits to the day care center would be impossible.

ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS

Even if only part of an allegation is not true, what then is the answer to the question “Why are victims alleging things that do not seem to be true?” After consulting with psychiatrists, psychologists, anthropologists, therapists, social workers, child sexual abuse experts, and law enforcement investigators for more than eight years, I can find no single, simple answer. The answer to the question seems to be a complex set of dynamics that can be different in each case. In spite of the fact that some skeptics keep looking for it, there does not appear to be one answer to the question that fits every case. Each case is different, and each case may involve a different combination of answers.

I have identified a series of possible alternative answers to this question. The alternative answers also do not preclude the possibility that clever offenders are sometimes involved. I will not attempt to explain completely these alternative answers because I cannot. They are presented simply as areas for consideration and evaluation by child sexual abuse intervenors, for further elaboration by experts in these fields, and for research by objective social scientists. The first step, however, in finding the answers to this question is to admit the possibility that some of what the victims describe may not have happened. Some child advocates seem unwilling to do this.

PATHOLOGICAL DISTORTION

The first possible answer to why victims are alleging things that do not seem to be true is pathological distortion. The allegations may be errors in processing reality influenced by underlying mental disorders such as dissociative disorders, borderline or histrionic personality disorders, or psychosis. These distortions may be manifested in false accounts of victimization in order to gain psychological benefits such as attention and sympathy (factitious disorder.) When such individuals repeatedly go from place to place or person to person making these false reports of their own “victimization,” it is called Munchausen Syndrome.

When the repealed false reports concern the “victimization” of their children or others linked to them, it is called Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. I am amazed when some therapists state that they believe the allegations because they cannot think of a reason why the “victim,” whose failures are now explained and excused or who is now the center of attention at a conference or on a national television program, would lie. If you can be forgiven for mutilating and killing babies, you can be forgiven for anything.

Many “victims” may develop pseudomemories of their victimization and eventually come to believe the events actually occurred. Noted forensic psychiatrist Park E. Dietz (personal communication, Nov. 1991) states:

“Pseudomemories have been acquired through dreams (particularly if one is encouraged to keep a journal or dream diary and to regard dream content as ‘clues’ about the past or as snippets of history,) substance-induced altered states of consciousness (alcohol or other drugs,) group influence (particularly hearing vivid accounts of events occurring to others with whom one identifies emotionally such as occurs in incest survivor groups,) reading vivid accounts of events occurring to others with whom one identifies emotionally, watching such accounts in films or on television, and hypnosis. The most efficient means of inducing pseudomemories is hypnosis.

“It is characteristic of pseudomemories that the recollections of complex events (as opposed to a simple unit of information, such as a tag number) are incomplete and without chronological sequence. Often the person reports some uncertainty because the pseudomemories are experienced in a manner they describe as ‘hazy’, ‘fuzzy’, or ‘vague’. They are often perplexed that they recall some details vividly but others dimly.

“Pseudomemories are not delusions. When first telling others of pseudomemories, these individuals do not have the unshakable but irrational conviction that deluded subjects have, but with social support they often come to defend vigorously the truthfulness of the pseudomemories.

“Pseudomemories are not fantasies, but may incorporate elements from fantasies experienced in the past. Even where the events described are implausible, listeners may believe them because they are reported with such intense affect (i.e. with so much emotion attached to the story) that the listener concludes that the events must have happened because no one could ‘fake’ the emotional aspects of the retelling. It also occurs, however, that persons report pseudomemories in such a matter-of-fact and emotionless manner that mental health professionals conclude that the person has ‘dissociated’ intellectual knowledge of the events from emotional appreciation of their impact”.

TRAUMATIC MEMORY

The second possible answer is traumatic memory. Fear and severe trauma can cause victims to distort reality and confuse events. This is a well-documented fact in cases involving individuals taken hostage or in life-and-death situations. The distortions may be part of an elaborate defense mechanism of the mind called “splitting” – The victims create a clear-cut good-and-evil manifestation of their complex victimization that is then psychologically more manageable.

Through the defense mechanism of dissociation, the victim may escape the horrors of reality by inaccurately processing that reality. In a dissociative state a young child who ordinarily would know the difference might misinterpret a film or video as reality.

Another defense mechanism may tell the victim that it could have been worse, and so his or her victimization was not so bad. They are not alone in their victimization – other children were also abused. Their father who abused them is no different from other prominent people in the community they claim also abused them. Satanism may help to explain why their outwardly good and religious parents did such terrible things to them in the privacy of their home. Their religious training may convince them that such unspeakable acts by supposedly “good” people must be the work of the devil. The described human sacrifice may be symbolic of the “death” of their childhood.

It may be that we should anticipate that individuals severely abused as very young children by multiple offenders with fear as the primary controlling tactic will distort and embellish their victimization. Perhaps a horror-filled yet inaccurate account of victimization is not only not a counterindication of abuse, but is in fact a corroborative indicator of extreme physical, psychological, and/or sexual abuse. I do not believe it is a coincidence nor the result of deliberate planning by satanists that in almost all the cases of ritual abuse that have come to my attention, the abuse is alleged to have begun prior to the age of seven and perpetrated by multiple offenders.

It may well be that such abuse, at young age by multiple offenders, is the most difficult to accurately recall with the specific and precise detail needed by the criminal justice system, and the most likely to be distorted and exaggerated when it is recalled. In her book _Too Scared to Cry_ (1990,) child psychiatrist Lenore Terr, a leading expert on psychic trauma in childhood, states “that a series of early childhood shocks might not be fully and accurately ‘reconstructed’ from the dreams and behaviors of the adult” (p. 5.)

NORMAL CHILDHOOD FEARS AND FANTASY

The third possible answer may be normal childhood fears and fantasy. Most young children are afraid of ghosts and monsters. Even as adults, many people feel uncomfortable, for example, about dangling their arms over the side of their bed. They still remember the “monster” under the bed from childhood. While young children may rarely invent stories about sexual activity, they might describe their victimization in terms of evil as they understand it. In church or at home, children may be told of satanic activity as the source of evil. The children may be “dumping” all their fears and worries unto an attentive and encouraging listener.

Children do fantasize. Perhaps whatever causes a child to allege something impossible (such as being cut up and put back together) is similar to what causes a child to allege something possible but improbable (such as witnessing another child being chopped up and eaten.)

MISPERCEPTION, CONFUSION, AND TRICKERY

Misperception, confusion, and trickery may be a fourth answer. Expecting young children to give accurate accounts of sexual activity for which they have little frame of reference is unreasonable. The Broadway play _Madame Butterfly_ is the true story of a man who had a 15-year affair, including the “birth” of a baby, with a “woman” who turns out to have been a man all along. If a grown man does not know when he has had vaginal intercourse with a woman, how can we expect young children not to be confused?

Furthermore some clever offenders may deliberately introduce elements of satanism and the occult into the sexual exploitation simply to confuse or intimidate the victims. Simple magic and other techniques may be used to trick the children. Drugs may also be deliberately used to confuse the victims and distort their perceptions. Such acts would then be M.O., not ritual.

As previously stated, the perceptions of young victims may also be influenced by any trauma being experienced. This is the most popular alternative explanation, and even the more zealous believers of ritual abuse allegations use it, but only to explain obviously impossible events.

OVERZEALOUS INTERVENORS

Overzealous intervenors, causing intervenor contagion, may be a fifth answer. These intervenors can include parents, family members, foster parents, doctors, therapists, social workers, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and any combination thereof. Victims have been subtly as well as overtly rewarded and bribed by usually well- meaning intervenors for furnishing further details. In addition, some of what appears not to have happened may have originated as a result of intervenors making assumptions about or misinterpreting what the victims are saying. The intervenors then repeat, and possibly embellish, these assumptions and misinterpretations, and eventually the victims are “forced” to agree with or come to accept this “official” version of what happened.

The judgment of intervenors may be affected by their zeal to uncover child sexual abuse, satanic activity, or conspiracies. However “well-intentioned,” these overzealous intervenors must accept varying degrees of responsibility for the unsuccessful prosecution of those cases where criminal abuse did occur. This is the most controversial and least popular of the alternative explanations.

URBAN LEGENDS

Allegations of and knowledge about ritualistic or satanic abuse may also be spread through urban legends. In _The Vanishing Hitchhiker_ (1981,) the first of his four books on the topic, Dr. Jan Harold Brunvand defines urban legends as “realistic stories concerning recent events (or alleged events) with an ironic or supernatural twist” (p. xi.) Dr. Brunvand’s books convincingly explain that just because individuals throughout the country who never met each other tell the same story does not mean that it is true.

Absurd urban legends about the corporate logos of Proctor and Gamble and Liz Claiborne being satanic symbols persist in spite of all efforts to refute them with reality. Some urban legends about child kidnappings and other threats to citizens have even been disseminated unknowingly by law enforcement agencies. Such legends have always existed, but today the mass media aggressively participate in their rapid and more efficient dissemination.

Many Americans mistakenly believe that tabloid television shows check out and verify the details of their stories before putting them on the air. Mass hysteria may partially account for large numbers of victims describing the same symptoms or experiences.

Training conferences for all the disciplines involved in child sexual abuse may also play a role in the spread of this contagion. At one child abuse conference I attended, an exhibitor was selling more than 50 different books dealing with satanism and the occult. By the end of the conference, he had sold nearly all of them. At another national child sexual abuse conference, I witnessed more than 100 attendees copying down the widely disseminated 29 “Symptoms Characterizing Satanic Ritual Abuse” in preschool-aged children. Is a four-year-old child’s “preoccupation with urine and feces” an indication of satanic ritual abuse or part of normal development?

COMBINATION

Most multidimensional child sex ring cases probably involve a combination of the answers previously set forth, as well as other possible explanations unknown to me at this time. Obviously, cases with adult survivors are more likely to involve some of these answers than those with young children. Each case of sexual victimization must be individually evaluated on its own merits without any preconceived explanations. All the possibilities must be explored if for no other reason than the fact that the defense attorneys for any accused subjects will almost certainly do so.

Most people would agree that just because a victim tells you one detail that turns out to be true, this does not mean that every detail is true. But many people seem to believe that if you can disprove one part of a victim’s story, then the entire story is false. As previously stated, one of my main concerns in these cases is that people are getting away with sexually abusing children or committing other crimes because we cannot prove that they are members of organized cults that murder and eat people.

I have discovered that the subject of multidimensional child sex rings is a very emotional and polarizing issue. Everyone seems to demand that one choose a side. On one side of the issue are those who say that nothing really happened and it is all a big witch hunt led by overzealous fanatics and incompetent “experts.” The other side says, in essence, that everything happened; victims never lie about child sexual abuse, and so it must be true.

There is a middle ground. It is the job of the professional investigator to listen to all the victims and conduct an appropriate investigation in an effort to find out what happened, considering all possibilities. Not all childhood trauma is abuse. Not all child abuse is a crime. The great frustration of these cases is the fact that you are often convinced that something traumatic happened to the victim, but do not know with any degree of certainty exactly what happened, when it happened, or who did it.

DO VICTIMS LIE ABOUT SEXUAL ABUSE AND EXPLOITATION?

The crucial central issue in the evaluation of a response to cases of multidimensional child sex rings is the statement “Children never lie about sexual abuse or exploitation. If they have details, it must have happened.” This statement, oversimplified by many, is the basic premise upon which some believe the child sexual abuse and exploitation movement is based. It is almost never questioned or debated at training conferences. In fact, during the 1970s, there was a successful crusade to eliminate laws requiring corroboration of child victim statements in child sexual abuse cases. The best way to convict child molesters is to have the child victims testify in court. If we believe them, the jury will believe them. Any challenge to this basic premise was viewed as a threat to the movement and a denial that the problem existed.

I believe that children rarely lie about sexual abuse or exploitation, if a lie is defined as a statement deliberately and maliciously intended to deceive. The problem is the oversimplification of the statement. Just because a child is not lying does not necessarily mean the child is telling the truth. I believe that in the majority of these cases, the victims are not lying. They are telling you what they have come to believe has happened to them. Furthermore the assumption that children rarely lie about sexual abuse does not necessarily apply to everything a child says during a sexual abuse investigation. Stories of mutilation, murder, and cannibalism are not really about sexual abuse.

Children rarely lie about sexual abuse or exploitation, but they do fantasize, furnish false information, furnish misleading information, misperceive events, try to please adults, respond to leading questions, and respond to rewards. Children are not adults in little bodies and do go through developmental stages that must be evaluated and understood. In many ways, however, children are no better and no worse than other victims or witnesses of a crime. They should not be automatically believed, nor should they be automatically disbelieved.

The second part of the statement – if children can supply details, the crime must have happened – must also be carefully evaluated. The details in question in most of the cases of multidimensional child sex rings have little to do with sexual activity. Law enforcement and social workers must do more than attempt to determine how a child could have known about the sex acts. These cases involve determining how a victim could have known about a wide variety of bizarre and ritualistic activity. Young children may know little about specific sex acts, but they may know a lot about monsters, torture, kidnapping, and murder.

Victims may supply details of sexual and other acts using information from sources other than their own direct victimization. Such sources must be evaluated carefully by the investigator of multidimensional child sex rings.

PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE

The victim may have personal knowledge of the sexual or ritual acts, but not as a result of the alleged victimization. The knowledge could have come from viewing pornography, sex education, or occult material; witnessing sexual or ritual activity in the home; or witnessing the sexual abuse of others. It could also have come from having been sexually or physically abused, but by other than the alleged offenders and in ways other than the alleged offense.

OTHER CHILDREN OR VICTIMS

Young children today are socially interacting more often and at a younger age than ever before. Many parents are unable to provide possibly simple explanations for their children’s stories because they were not with the children when the events occurred. They do not even know what videotapes their children may have seen, what games they may have played, or what stories they may have been told or overheard. Children are being placed in day care centers for eight, ten, or twelve hours a day starting as young as six weeks of age. The children share experiences by playing house, school, or doctor. Bodily functions such as urination and defecation are a focus of attention for these young children. To a certain extent, each child shares the experiences of all the other children.

The odds are fairly high that in any typical day care center there might be some children who are victims of incest; victims of physical abuse; victims of psychological abuse; children of cult members (even satanists); children of sexually open parents; children of sexually indiscriminate parents; children of parents obsessed with victimization; children of parents obsessed with the evils of satanism; children without conscience; children with a teenage brother or pregnant mother; children with heavy metal music and literature in the home; children with bizarre toys, games, comics, and magazines; children with a VCR and slasher films in their home; children with access to dial-a-porn, party lines, or pornography; or children victimized by a day care center staff member.

The possible effects of the interaction of such children prior to the disclosure of the alleged abuse must be evaluated, Adult survivors may obtain details from group therapy sessions, support networks, church groups, or self-help groups. The willingness and ability of siblings to corroborate adult survivor accounts of ritual abuse varies. Some will support and partially corroborate the victim’s allegations. Others will vehemently deny them and support their accused parents or relatives.

MEDIA

The amount of sexually explicit, occult, anti-occult, or violence- oriented material available to adults and even children in the modern world is overwhelming. This includes movies, videotapes, television, music, toys, and books. There are also documentaries on satanism, witchcraft, and the occult that are available on videotape. Most of the televangelists have videotapes on the topics that they are selling on their programs.

The National Coalition on Television Violence News (1988) estimates that 12% of the movies produced in the United States can be classified as satanic horror films. Cable television and the home VCR make all this material readily available even to young children. Religious broadcasters and almost all the television tabloid and magazine programs have done shows on satanism and the occult. Heavy metal and black metal music, which often has a satanic theme, is readily available and popular. In addition to the much-debated fantasy role-playing games, there are numerous popular toys on the market with an occult-oriented, bizarre, or violent theme.

Books on satanism and the occult, both fiction and nonfiction, are readily available in most bookstores, especially Christian bookstores. Several recent books specifically discuss the issue of ritual abuse of children. Obviously, very young children do not read this material, but their parents, relatives, and therapists might and then discuss it in front of or with them. Much of the material intended to fight the problem actually fuels the problem and damages effective prosecution.

SUGGESTIONS AND LEADING QUESTIONS

This problem is particularly important in cases stemming from custody/visitation disputes involving at least one child under the age of seven. It is my opinion that most suggestive, leading questioning of children by intervenors is inadvertently done as part of a good-faith effort to learn the truth. Not all intervenors are in equal positions to potentially influence victim allegations. Parents and relatives especially are in a position to subtly influence their young children to describe their victimization in a certain way. Children may also overhear their parents discussing the details of the case. Children often tell their parents what they believe their parents want or need to hear.

Some children may be instinctively attempting to provide “therapy” for their parents by telling them what seems to satisfy them and somehow makes them feel better. In one case a father gave the police a tape recording to “prove” that his child’s statements were spontaneous disclosures and not the result of leading, suggestive questions. The tape recording indicated just the opposite. Why then did the father voluntarily give it to the police? Probably because he truly believed that he was not influencing his child’s statements – but he was.

Therapists are probably in the best position to influence the allegations of adult survivors. The accuracy and reliability of the accounts of adult survivors who have been hypnotized during therapy is certainly open to question. One nationally-known therapist personally told me that the reason police cannot find out about satanic or ritualistic activity from child victims is that they do not know how to ask leading questions.

LINK TO TGE SOURCE: http://www.cultwatch.com

HIGHLY SUGGESTIVE BOOKS AND 
INFORMATIVE TEXTS IN PDF FORMAT: 

 

● brochure_ritualabuse040201.pdf

● langone_satanism.pdf

● Fritz Springmeier – Be Wise As Serpents.pdf

● Fritz Springmeier – Bloodlines Of The Illuminati.pdf

● Fritz Springmeier – Deeper Insights Into The Illuminati Forumula (2).pdf

● Fritz-Springmeier.-Various-Articles.pdf

● OnePsychiatristsViewofSatanicRitualAbuse.pdf

● SATANIC CULT AWARENESS.pdf

 

SATANIC ELITE BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI..

---

The leader of the Illuminati here on Earth is called ‘the Pindar’. ‘The Pindar’, is a member of one of the 13 ruling Illuminati families, the Pindar is always male. The title; ‘The Pindar’, is an inbreeding term of “The pentacle of the draco” (the penis of the dragon) symbolically this represents; the top of power, control, creation, penetration, expansion, incision and fear.. The holder of this rank is the head of the Rothschild family, and has been for many generations (many hundred years).

 

---

1 DIV – THE TOP 13 OF THE RULING ILLUMINATI FAMILIES ARE:

 

● ROTHSCHILD (BAUER / BOWER)

● BRUCE

● CAVENDISH (KENNEDY)

● DE MEDICI

● HANOVER

● HABSBURG / HAPSBURG

● KRUPP

● PLANTAGENET

● ROCKEFELLER

● ROMANOV

● SINCLAIR (ST. CLAIR)

● WARBURG (DEL BANCO)

● WINDSOR (SAXE-COBURG-GOETHE 

 

The top ranked ruling families are 13, each family have 13 families underlying their commands. The number 13, is magical and sacred to the Illuminati. And so it continues.. Pyramid anatomic structure of power.

 

DIV 2 – THE SECOND DIVISION OF TOP ILLUMINATI MEMBERS ARE, MEMBERS OF ‘THE COMMITTEE OF 300’ ARE:

 

● AGNELLI

● BALLIOL

● BEALE

● BELL

● BOUVIER

● BUSH

● CAMERON

● CAMPBELL

● CARNEGIE

● CARRINGTON

● COOLIDGE

● DELANO

● DOUGLAS

● FORD

● GARDNER

● GRAHAM

● HAMILTON

● HARRIMAN

● HEINZ

● KUHN

● LINDSAY

● LOEB

● MELLON

● MONTGOMERY

● MORGAN

● NORMAN

● OPPENHEIMER

● RHODES

● ROOSEVELT

● RUSSELL

● SAVOY

● SCHIFF

● SETON

● SPENCER

● STEWART/ STUART

● TAFT

● WILSON

The Illuminati families have through many generations deliberately infiltrated and hijacked high ranked posts in the full spectrum of our society, as we know it today, all regions have been compromised (more or less) especially the positions containing high authorization and power.

The Illuminati families have followed this secret agenda for many hundreds even thousands years, to accomplish their goal of ultimate power and the world populated with their own slaves, and themselves as kings of imortal gods on the thrones, ruling openly without secrecy.

THE ORGANIZATIONS/CORPORATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED /HIJACKED BY THE ILLUMINATI BLOODLINE FAMILIES: 

 

● COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS

● THE BILDERBERG GROUP

● TRILATERAL COMMISSION

● CLUB OF ROME

● ROYAL INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

● THE MAFIA

● CIA

● NSA

● MOSSAD

● SECRET SERVICES

● INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

● FEDERAL RESERVE

● INTERNATIONAL REVENUE SERVICE

● INTERPOL 

 

 

THE ILLUMINATI ALSO CREATED MANY ‘ARTIFICAL COUNTRIES’, TO FURTHER SUPPORT THEIR OWN SINISTER GOALS. TO CREATE ECONOMICAL CRISIS, WARS BETWEEN THESE COUNTRIES, TO BREED MORE ECONOMICAL PROSPERITY TO THEMSELVES. THESE ‘ARTIFICIAL COUNTRIES’,
THESE COUNTRIES ARE: 

 

● THE UNITED STATES 

● KUWAIT

● THE SOVIET UNION

● PANAMA

● ISRAEL

● ITALY

● YUGOSLAVIA

● THE UNITED KINGDOM

● MOST OF THE BLACK AFRICA

● ALL OF THE ARAB COUNTRIES

● ALL OF CENTRAL & SOUTH AFRICA’

● SWITZERLAND – (was created to hide or keep the wealth that was financed from the wars that they created and executed, without being observed by the public) 

---

AMERICA = THE SECRET MEANING OF THE NAME..

---

• AM = IS THE HEBREW WORD FOR PEOPLE

• AME = IS ALSO THE COMMAND FORM OF THE SPANISH/LATIN WORD; “TO LOVE”

• “ERI” = OR “ARI”, IS THE HEBREW WORD FOR LION

• RICA = IS THE FEMININE VERSION OF THE SPANISH WORD FOR; “RICH”

• KA = IS THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN WORD FOR; “SOUL”, OR “SPIRIT FORCE”, WITHIN A BODY

---

The ideology of the Illuminatis is a eclectic and confusing mixture of religions, ideologies, philosophies and quantum physical calculations, scientific experimental ideas, + mysticism, occultism, shamanism, judaism, kabbalism, gnosticism, satanism, taoism, externalism, center-egoism, materialistic values and priories, voodoo magic, chaos magick, cannibalism, pedophilia, spirituality, psychiatric and neuro-psychology hypoteses, all these ingredients together gave the birth of their mystical of luciferian Doctrine/ Luciferian Dualism, manifests itself by the structure of their thinking and visualazion of using two or many; opposite components as the main constructions of their complete product.

---

Watch “Dualism – As Above So Below – Order Out Of Chaos Explained” on YouTube:

https://youtu.be/mZREYeRF7VA

---

 

● THE LATIN FEMININE LEGAL IDEALS
+
● THE MASCULINE HEBREW IDEAS

The United States were created by the Illuminati to support their secret agenda.

King James the made a pact with the Roman Catholic Church (The Vatican, and the secret society of the Jesuits), that they would be the owner of United States, while the monarchy of Britain would be the force regency of England, United States and Canada.

HILLARY CLINTON IS GUILTY IN MORE THAN ONE ACCUSATION…

These articles are a compilation of reshared articles

with extra topic related additions, that I’ve found while researching + my own notes / opinions, I’ve also added related graphics, and in the end there’s extra topic related information added, to support this article and my agreeing biases)

Article:

BREAKING VIDEO: NON DUPLICATE EMAIL’S HAVE BEEN FOUND ON WEINER’S LAPTOP..

By: AMY MORENO, NOVEMBER 2, 2016 – BREAKING NEWS

Well, that’s it, folks – the LAST hope the Clinton campaign had is now gone.

They were hoping all of the emails on Weiner’s laptop were duplicates, but tonight we learn that is not the case.

Fox News is reporting that emails found on Weiner’s laptop are NOT duplicates.

This situation just got a lot more serious for Hillary Clinton.
… Yet even more serious consequences for Hillary Clinton is waiting…

USA NEWS 11:10 P.M – Nov 2, 2016

@USANEWS007

BREAKING!!! Non Duplicate Emails have been discovered on Anthony Weiners Laptop, from Hillary Clinton’s Criminal Server.. 

#PodestaEmails

● Anthony Wiener is convicted of pedophila and he is married to Huma Aberdin, that is Hillary Clintons, closest confidant.

NOVEMBER 3, 2016

The facts that’s been proven accurate, about Hillary Clintons criminal activites are:

What’s being revealed about Hillary Clinton is far more serious and will result in her being placed on war crimes charges.

● The evidence shows that Hillary Clinton greenlighted, supported and armed with Saudi Qatar and the GCC the Wahhabist jihadist terror groups of : Muslim brotherhood, al Qeada al Nusra Islamic state & Boko haram.

● They have murdered over 500,00 across the Middle East and North Africa and created over 4 million refugees.

● Hillary Clinton has to be charged for her role in this genocide.

● Hillary Clinton and her assistent Huma Aberdin, has been caught with hiddeous crimes in a video (uploaded on the deep dark webb). In the video Hillary Clinton and Huma Aberdin is sexually molesting, torturing and murdering a underaged girl, before they kill the girl, they skin her face off, and Hillary is taunting the crying and screaming girl by taking the piece of skinned face and placing it on top of her own face, while dancing and laughing and singing..

● Hillary Clinton first denied that she deliberatly had tried to delete the whole content of private emails, on a server that was related to her office in the white house, trying to hide evidence of her crimes and betrayal against America.

● As the USA political and legal system is now found corrupted, the international body to deal with this is the International Criminal Court in The Hague of which the USA is a signatory.

● Hillary when found guilty could even face the death penalty for the scale of her deciet, corruption and genocide.

BELOW LINK TO THE SOURCE:
https://truthfeed.com/breaking-video-non-duplicate-emails-have-been-found-on-weiners-laptop/33579/

___________________________________________________________

Article:

DID HILLARY CLINTON VIOLATE ANY OF THESE SIX CRIMINAL STATUTES?

By: Eric Zuesse, 15 June 2018

The U.S. Government still refuses to present any of these 6 criminal cases, against her, to a grand jury. 

On 14 June 2018, the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Justice ruled that the FBI was correct to have recommended that the U.S. Department of Justice not prosecute, nor even investigate and place before a grand jury for consideration, a charge that Hillary Clinton had violated, even just a single one ofthe following 6 U.S. federal criminal statutes. But do you think she violated one or more of them? 

HERE THEY ARE:

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

(a) Destruction or Removal of Property To Prevent Seizure

Whoever, before, during, or after any search for or seizure of property by any person authorized to make such search or seizure, knowingly destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of preventing or impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody or control or to continue holding such property under its lawful custody and control, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Impairment of In Rem Jurisdiction

Whoever, knowing that property is subject to the in rem jurisdiction of a United States court for purposes of civil forfeiture under Federal law, knowingly and without authority from that court, destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of impairing or defeating the court’s continuing in rem jurisdiction over the property, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1512 — Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(c) Whoever corruptly

(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 2071 — Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 641 — Public money, property or records

Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use, or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof, …

Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years or both. …

18 U.S. Code § 793 — Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information …

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —

Shall be fined not more than $10, 000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy, shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

*

What do you think? As you consider the matter, you might want to know two things:

First, that the FBI’s ‘investigation’ of Clinton’s privatized email system was faked: it ignored each one of these six statutes.

Second, there were at least two cases that had been mentioned in the news media in which the U.S. federal Government did, in fact, investigate, and bring charges, and win a conviction on one or more of these federal charges, and which at leastseem to differ from what Clinton did in only one respect — that she did it far more extensively, and more brazenly, than did that prosecuted person. The independent journalist who goes by the pseudonym “Tyler Durden” headlined, only a day after Mr. Comey on 5 July 2016 exonerated Ms. Clinton, “Meet Bryan Nishimura, Found Guilty For ‘Removal And Retention Of Classified Materials’,” and that conviction of Nishimura was won on the same statute for which the FBI’s Comey, as Clinton’s would-be policeman, jury, and judge, peremptorilyexonerated her — refused to bring any charge at all. “Durden”, at his famous “Zero Hedge” site, noted:

“Here is the FBI itself, less than a year ago, charging one Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom [California], who pleaded guilty to ‘unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials’ without malicious intent, in other words precisely what the FBI alleges Hillary did (h/t@DavidSirota)”.

He linked to this case. Nishimura was sentenced to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. He was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance, and to never again seek such a clearance. (Hillary Clinton continued to have her security clearance, and to run for the U.S. Presidency.)

Furthermore, even before Comey had announced Clinton’s exoneration, Josh Gersten at ‘Politico’, had already headlined on 27 May 2016, “Sub sailor’s photo case draws comparisons to Clinton emails”, and he reported that,

“A Navy sailor [Kristian Saucier] entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus. … To some, the comparison to Clinton’s case may appear strained. Clinton has said none of the information on her server was marked classified at the time”.

‘Politico’s’, Gersten took her word for it, that “none of the information on her server was marked classified at the time,” but is the FBI supposed to do that — to take a suspect’s allegation at face-value, instead of to check it out? (Should Gersten even have done that?)

There probably are other such prosecutions that have successsfully been pursued, but the news media don’t seem to be interested in following up on this matter now, any more than the U.S. federal Government has done. If the U.S. federal Government doesn’t want to investigate Clinton on any of these six criminal statutes, then that’s good enough for the news-media — or is it? Will it be “enough”?

So, wherever the present article is published, and if there is a reader-comments section there, then: What do you think? Is this treatment of what Hillary Clinton did, “Equal Justice Under Law”? Obviously, it’s bipartisan, politically (unless Trump will now demand his FBI to examine what she did on each one of these six statutes); but, in terms of justice: Is this matter, thus far, equal justice under law? Or not? And, if it’s not, then what does that say about whether our country is a democracy? What do you think about these questions?

* 

 

____________________________________________________________

Article:

DAMNING HILLARY EMAILS PROBE REPORT..

By: Stephen Lendman, 16 June 2018

Department of Justice (DOJ)Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz investigated Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private server use for official State Department business – including easily hacked documents marked “classified,” “secret” and “top secret”.

She’s criminally culpable for violating State Department rules and US statute laws, prohibiting documents and other information pertaining to national security and defense from being moved or removed from their “proper place of custody”.

Former FBI director James Comey obstructed justice, dismissively calling her criminality “extreme carelessness”, making him complicit in serious wrongdoing.

Ordinary Americans are held to one standard, privileged ones another, justice whatever powerful figures want it to be. Rule of law principles don’t matter.

Horowitz found evidence of FBI “willingness” to damage Trump’s presidential campaign when James Comey served as director.
The 500-page IG report included detailed information on FBI and DOJ dysfunctional and unaccountable actions throughout the probe into Hillary’s private server use for official State Department business.
A damning text message between FBI agent Peter Strzokand his mistress Lisa Page, former attorney for then-deputy agency director Andrew McCabe, said:

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it…”
Lisa Page said; – Trump is “not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Peter Strzok responded:

“No, no he won’t, we’ll stop it”!
Peter Strzok served as deputy assistant director to special counsel Mueller’s Russiagate witch-hunt investigation, leading the probe – later removed because of anti-Trump text messages with bureau lawyer Lisa Page.

Peter Strzok changed the FBI’s language about Hillary’s illegal email server use for official State Department business from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” an attempt to whitewash her criminality.

Text messages between; Peter Strzok and Lisa Page showed that; James Comey lied to Congress under oath, claiming he didn’t consult with the ‘DOJ’ or White House about the Hillary probe.
In his report, Michael Horowitz said;

Peter Strzok’s text messages and actions are “not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”, adding:

The ‘Russiagate’ probe “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations”.
That alone is reason enough to end the witch-hunt – what never should have been initiated in the first place, begun and continuing solely to delegitimize president Trump for the wrong reasons (not the right ones) and bash Russia.
NOTHING JUSTIFIES WHAT’S GOING ON!

In response to the IG report, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton issued the following statement:

“The IG report has destroyed the credibility of the Department of Justice and the FBI. It confirms what Judicial Watch has investigated and revealed for nearly two years”.
“The Obama DOJ/FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was rushed, half-baked, rigged, and irredeemably compromised by; anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias and actions”.
“As Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal, it is outrageous to see a politicized FBI and ‘DOJ’ then so obviously refuse to uphold the rule of law”.
“The IG report details repeated ‘DOJ’/FBI deference to Hillary Clinton, her aides and their lawyers”.
“Americans should examine the report and judge for themselves whether the over-the-top deference to Hillary Clinton can be explained as anything other than political, especially from agencies that at the same time were actively collaborating with the Clinton campaign’s Fusion GPS to spy on and target then-candidate Trump”.
“The IG report details how at least five top FBI agents and lawyers exchanged pro-Clinton and anti-Trump communications”.
“The IG shares the concerns of Judicial Watch and millions of Americans that this bias cast a cloud over the credibility of the Clinton email and Russia investigations”.

“As Judicial Watch has demonstrated through its independent investigations and lawsuits, there is more than enough evidence that Clinton knowingly and intentionally mishandled classified information while using a non-government email system to conduct government business”.
“Will the Sessions Justice Department now do the right thing and conduct a Clinton email investigation properly?”
“Or will it let James Comey and (Obama attorney general) ‘Loretta Lynch’, have the last word on Hillary Clinton’s evident email crimes?
“In the meantime, Judicial Watch will continue its ongoing FOIA lawsuits and investigations into the Clinton email scandal and the related Obama administration cover-up”.
Law Professor Jonathan Turley, said the following:

“The IG sinks Comey’s narrative with a finding that he ‘deviated’ from Justice Department rules and acted in open insubordination”.
“There is now a comprehensive conclusion by career investigators that Comey violated core (FBI) rules…In other words, there was ample reason to fire James Comey”.

There’s clear ample reason to hold Hillary, Comey and others accountable for their unlawful actions. 

LIST OF KNOWN PEDO-NAMES IN AMERICA:

---

LIST OF POLITICAL CONNECTED PEDO-NAMES:

---

● Hillary Clinton
● Bill Clinton
● George Nader (Businessman)
● Huma Aberdin
● Laura Silsby
● Rachel Chandler
● Jeffrey Epstein
● Ghislaine Maxwell
● John Podesta
● Michael Podesta
● James Alefantis
● Anthony Wiener
● Leslie Wexner (Limited Inc Chairman)
● Herbert Strauss
● Isidor Strauss
● Martin A. Nowak
● Steven Spielberg
● Edgar Bronfman Sr. (Seagram Chairman)
● Charles Bronfman (Seagram Co)
● Michael Steinhardt (former hedge-fund manager)
● Sara Bronfman
● Clare Bronfman
● Niles Lehman (Professor at Portland State University)
● Seth Roger
● Ruth Ginsberg
● Alison Mack
● Rachel Chandler
● Robert Maxwell

---

LIST OF HOLLYWOOD PEDO-NAMES:

---

● Steven Spielberg
● Michael Jackson
● Kevin Spacey
● Marc Collins-Rector (Founder of Den)
● Chad Shackley
● Brock Pierce
● David Geffen
● Tom Hanks
● Dustin Hoffman
● Andrew Kreisberg (American television writer, producer)
● Bryan Singer
● Harvey Weinstein
● Bob Weinstein
● Roman Polanski
● Ruma Hazard
● Charlie Sheen
● Madonna
● Kate Perry
● Miley Cyrus

● Marina Abramovic 

● Robert Redford

● Clint Eastwood 

 

---

LIST OF NAMES OF VISITORS ON EPSTEIN ISLAND:

---

● Chris Tucker
● Larry Summers
● Lisa Summers
● Bill Murray
● Bill Hammond
● Ehud Barak
● Andrés Pastrana (Former President of Colombia 1998-2002)
● Jean Luc Brunel
● Doug Band
● Ron Burkle
● Woody Allen
● Sarah Kellen
● Ray Barzanna
● Sandy Burger
● Andrea Mitrovitch
● Peter Marino
● Shelley Lewis
● Paul Hala(t) (d) a
● Richardo Legoretta
● Tom Pritzker
● Kelly Spamm
● Tiffany Gramza
● Claire Hazel
● Paula Epstein
● Mark Epstein
● Ralph Elison
● Sophie Biddle
● Audrey Raimbault
● Shelley Harrison
● Melinda Luntz
● Gwendolyn Beck
● Albert Pinto
● Linda Pinto
● Gary Roxburgh
● Mandy Elison
● Jean Michelle Gathy
● Virginia Roberts
● Kristy Rodgers (Kristina Real Rodgers)
● Greg Holbert
● Alyssa Rodgers
● Juliette Bryant
● Heather Mann
● Ed Tuttle
● Glen Dubin
● Ellen Spencer
● Chris Wagner
● Casey Wasserman
● Laura Wasserman
● Paul Mellon
● Oliver Sachs
● Henry Rosovsky
● Lynn Forester (de Rothschild)
● Joe Pagano
● Naomi Campbell
● Nicole Junkermann
● Rodney Slater
● Magali Blachon (Deperrier)
● Svetlana Griaznova
● Emmy Tayler
● Larry Visoski
● Teala Davies
● Juan (Pablo) Molyneux
● Freya Willemoes) Wissing
● Adam Perry Lang
● Fleur Perry Lang
● Caren Casey
● Hank Coller
● Cindy Lopez
● Mark Lloyd
● Alan Dershowitz
● Seth Green
● James Gunn
● Steven Spielberg
● Tom Hanks
● Steven Colbert
● Jimmy Kimmel
● Barack Obama
● Kevin Spacey
● Kathy Griffin
● Oprah Winfrey
● Shawn Carter
● Beyoncé Knowles
● Anthony Kiedis
● John Legend
● Chrissy Tiegen
● Jim Carrey
● Steven Tyler
● Ben Affleck
● Stephen Collins
● Will Ferrell
● Aliaune Damala Badara Thiam (Akon)
● Marshall Matters
● Jeffrey Jones
● Victor Salva
● Mark Collins Rector
● Charlie Sheen
● Tyler Grasham
● Madonna Ciccone
● Katheryn Hudson
● Gwen Stefani
● Stefani Germanotta
● James Franco
● Will Smith
● Justin Roland
● John Cusack
● Anderson Cooper
● Demi Moore
● Brian Affleck
● Meryl Streep
● Wanda Sykes
● Chelsea Handler
● Michelle Wolf
● David Yarovesky
● Pharrell Williams
● Quentin Tarantino
● Courtney Love
● Alec Baldwin
● Robert Downey Jr.

● Prince Andrew 

● 

YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP: LIST OF BANNED CHANNELS – VARIOUS THEMES EMERGE..

This article is reshared + with extra topic related additions, that I’ve found while researching + my own notes / opinions, I’ve also added related graphics, and in the end there’s extra topic related information added, to support this article and my agreeing biases)

YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP: LIST OF BANNED CHANNELS – VARIOUS THEMES EMERGE..

The list of banned and censored YouTube channels is rapidly increasing, as Google-owned YouTube has been carrying out a censorship blitz to strike many long-standing, hugely popular channels from its platform.

Alphabet-Google-YouTube is a giant corporation, and corporations are run for one purpose (profit), so from one perspective, this censorship spree seems self-defeating, since they are deleting many popular channels.

Some of these had huge followings of between 100,000 and 500,000 (or more), which may cost YouTube money in the short term.

However, to understand this censorship purge you need to understand that the Hidden Hand or the dark force which controls the New World Order also controls Alphabet-Google-Youtube, and is clearly using its reach and power to suppress alternative thought.

YOUTUBE, GOOGLE, FACEBOOK, TWITTER: PUBLICLY-FUNDED “PRIVATE ” CORPORATIONS..

At first glance, it may seem fair that social media giants like YouTube get to censor people, because they are private companies not public/ government companies, right? It’s their platform, right? Not exactly.

These social media companies are more like private-public partnerships. They would never have gotten off the ground were it not for the government’s seed money, especially through MIC agencies like DARPA and the CIA.

Additionally, these companies are given massive tax breaks every year. Alphabet-Google in particular has a very close relationship with the US Government.

Is it fair for these companies to take so much public help and support, then turn around and disregard the right to free speech as enshrined in the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution and elsewhere?

CENSORSHIP ON THE FAKEST OF PRETEXTS..

Make no mistake about their actions; this is censorship, pure and simple. The censored YouTube channels were all given fake pretexts and false reasons, but the pattern of censorship is undeniable.

Alphabet-Google-YouTube found ways to delete entire channels on the basis that they were breaking YouTube’s nebulous “community guidelines”, or that they were in breach of copyright (relying on allegations of accusers).

For some or many of these, YouTube even went back 3+ years to find some piece of supposedly incriminating evidence in a video that had previously been perfectly fine. Any excuse will do.

In a similar vein, the Facebook account of David Icke (with 700,000+ followers) mysteriously disappeared and was taken down for over a week before being magically reinstated. Facebook later said it was a “mistake”. Sure it was..

Everyone in the Alternative Media / Independent Media is now fully aware that if they haven’t already been censored, they are about to be. It’s only a matter of time as the Establishment, via its Establishment platforms, purges any anti-Establishment view.

USING THE CENSORSHIP PURGE AGAINST THE CENSORS..

Every crisis has an opportunity, and although this censorship purge will affect the Independent Media in the short term, there are good things to come from it.

Firstly, it will force alternative content creators to migrate away from the giant corporate platforms to other places where their views, writing, speech, art and content will never be censored. Many great platforms already exist which are trying to find ways to reward content creators, such as Minds and Steemit.

Secondly, as we shall see below, the NWO censors are overplaying their hand by purging so much; the list of censored YouTube channels reveals a pattern of content. So now we can see what they don’t want us to know…

LIST OF CENSORED YOUTUBE CHANNELS..

Thanks to Reddit, we have this list of censored YouTube channels that was posted on March 1st, 2018. Since then, other YouTube channels have been deleted (such as Natural News / Mike Adams).

Some of the channels have been reinstated, but the writing is on the wall; it’s only a matter of time before they get permanently scrapped.

HERE’S THE LIST:

● According to Joe
● Adamic Amethyst
● AmericanEveryman
● animal farm
● Anti-School
● aplaintruth
● Arthur Koestler
● ashtonbirdie
● Back to the Constitution
● Barry Soetoro
● Blackstone
● Bombard’s Body Language *
● Brave New World
● Charles Walton
● Charlton
● Colin Flaherty
● Crow777 *
● Darkness at Noon
● David Seaman
● Defango *
● Destroying the Illusion
● Dr. Jerome Corsi
● Dr. of Common Sense
● Dustin Nemos
● Edgy Sphinx
● Elliott Marxx
● Eric Dubay
● Factions of Freedom
● FAKE NEWS REPORT
● Free Radio Revolution Revived
● FromDeath2Life
● Gematrianator
● HowISeeTheWorld
● InTruthbyGrace
● Jake Morphonios
● Jay Myers
● Jim Marrs
● Joanne Steen
● Johnny Supertramp
● JYW420
● Kalika from “For the People”
● Kearn Kearsy
● Kevin K Johnston
● Kinningan
● Lawarewolf
● Liberty Columnist
● Mag Bitter Truth
● Matrix Breakout
● Max Malone
● McFly
● McSimonius
● mgtow is freedom
● Mlordandgod
● Murdoch Murdoch
● Operation Hal
● Peekay
● Peekay Boston
● Psyched Substance
● Redd Dog Truth
● Richie Allen Show
● RichieFromBoston*
● Ron Johnson
● Russian Vids
● Sargon of Akkad *
● The Black Child
● The Kepler Telescope Channel
● The Ochelli Effect
● The Paulstaul Service
● Titus Frost
● TruthmediaRevolution
● Urban Moving
● Victurus Libertas VL
● WAP tech
● Willy Myco

As soon as I saw this list, I immediately recognized many of these channels as superb content providers. The owners of these channels are undoubtedly free thinkers willing to push the boundary of what is known and question everything.

Some very interesting themes emerge. Apparently, these are the topics that the NWO manipulators would rather you didn’t think about:

– False Flag shootings, including False Flag Hoaxes (Free Radio Revolution Revived, Peekay, Peekay Boston, The Paulstaul Service)

– Flat Earth (Eric Dubai, aplaintruth)

– Nanotechnology/Bioweapons, Directed Energy Weapons (aplaintruth)

– Gematria (Gematrianator)

– Space fakery / Moon as a Hologram (Crow777 [who I interviewed here], Russian vids)

– Various Aspects of the Global Conspiracy, e.g. Zionism, Geopolitics, Extraterrestrials and the Hidden History of Humanity (Jim Marrs, Richie Allen show, MLordandGod, Destroying the Illusion)

– Fake News (FAKE NEWS REPORT)

– Satanism, Hollywood, Pedophilia (Jay Myers, who process quality conspiracy analysis)

Yes, Alphabet-Google-YouTube has a distinct leftwing bias, due to its own ideology (as exposed in the incident where Google fired James Damore), and has been employing the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center, Rothschild connected) to purge rightwing channels.

However, this censorship blitz is far beyond left vs. right. It’s all about limiting the possible range of human thought to keep the Control System in place.

LAST THOUGHTS..

Let’s use this purge of censored YouTube channels to find better platforms that decentralize power, reward content creators and pledge to support free speech no matter what.

There is no reason we have to let the unlimited diversity of the internet – and the unlimited diversity of humanity – be stymied and controlled, or funneled into giant megalithic platforms that only seek to serve the Establishment.

By: Makia Freeman, Guest writer, HumansAreFree.com

ROCKEFELLER — THE PHARMACEUTICAL MAFIA..

INTRODUCTION

Throughout the twentieth century, the pharmaceutical industry was developed and organized with the aim of controlling health systems around the world through the systematic replacement of natural therapies not patentable by patentable synthetic substances and, therefore, lucrative. This industry did not evolve naturally. On the contrary, it was a decision adopted by a handful of wealthy and unscrupulous businessmen who wanted to make an investment. They deliberately identified the human body as their market scope in order to generate more wealth. 

ROCKEFELLER AND THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

The driving force of this investment industry was the Rockefeller Group. This already controlled more than 90% of the petrochemical industry in the United States at the turn of the century from the XIX to the XX, and was looking for new investment opportunities on an international scale. Another group of active investment in this sector was formed around the Rothschild financial group. 

 

After the Standard Oil of Rockefeller (now Exxon), the second largest conglomerate of pharmaceutical and petrochemical companies in the world during the first half of the 20th century, was from the IG Farben group based in Germany. In fact, World War II was a war of aggression prepared, started and directed from the planning councils of IG Farben. This was the parent company of IG Auschwitz, the largest industrial plant in this chemical industry cartel outside of Germany.
Much of the wealth of this cartel was accumulated with the blood and suffering of the slaves who worked in their factories, including those of the Auschwitz concentration camp. IG Farben supported and unscrupulously used the German political rulers with their powerful weapons, in order to achieve economic domination over all of Europe and the rest of the world. 

IG Farben was the main shareholder of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, and vice versa. At that time, the victory of the Allied Forces over Nazi Germany ended with IG Farben’s plans to become the world’s largest pharma-ceutical and petrochemical conglomerate. At the same time, Standard Oil and the other pharmaceutical and petrochemical companies of the Rockefeller consortium became the dominant financial group in this industry, and since then they have maintained this leadership position. 

In the 1947 Nuremberg War Crimes Council against the directors of the IG Farben cartel, some of them were found guilty and convicted of committing crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg War Crimes Council also dismantled the IG Farben cartel, which was dissolved in the Hoechst, Bayer and BASF companies.
Currently, the United States of America and Great Britain are the two leading nations in the world in the export of pharmaceutical products. In fact, two of the three drugs currently traded worldwide come from companies in these two countries. 
Cardiovascular diseases, cancer and other pathologies, which could have been prevented and largely eliminated long ago. The premature death of millions of people is not the result of coincidence or negligence. It has been deliberately and systematically organized for the benefit of the pharma-ceutical industry and its investors, with the sole purpose of expanding a trillion dollar global drug market.
The market scope of the pharmaceutical industry is the human body, and the return on capital invested depends on the continuation and expansion of diseases. Its benefits depend on the patentability of medicines, which makes this industry the most profitable on the planet Earth.

However, the prevention and eradication of any disease drastically reduces or completely eliminates the markets for drugs. Consequently, pharmaceutical companies have been systematically putting obstacles to the prevention and eradication of diseases.
To commit these crimes, pharmaceutical companies use a maze of executors and accomplices in the world of science, medicine, the media and politics. The governments of entire nations are manipulated or even led by members of pressure groups and former executives of the pharmaceutical industry. For several decades, the legislation of entire nations has been corrupted and abused to encourage this “business with diseases,” worth thousands of billions of dollars, risking the health and lives of hundreds of millions of innocent patients and people. 

A precondition for the rise of the pharmaceutical industry as a flashy investment business was the elimination of competition from safe and natural therapies, since these are not patentable and their profit margins are scarce. In addition, these natural therapies can help to effectively prevent and even eliminate diseases, due to their essential functions in cellular metabolism.

As a result of the systematic elimination of natural health therapies and the development of public health systems in most countries of the world, the pharmaceutical industry has caused millions of people, and almost every nation in the world, to depend on your investment business.
The pharmaceutical industry offers “health” to millions of patients, but does not distribute the goods. Instead, it distributes products that simply relieve symptoms while maintaining the underlying disease, as a precondition for the future of your business. To disguise this fraud, pharmaceutical companies spend twice as much money to hide it as they do research on future therapies. This organized scam is the reason why this investment business could continue, for almost a century, hidden behind a strategically designed smoke screen, which makes them “benefactors” of humanity. 

THE VACCINES IS JUST A TRAP TO MORE PHYSICAL ISSUES…

 

____________________________________________________________Article:

Eugenics Today: How Vaccines Are Used to Sterilize the Masses…

Written by: 21ST WIRE, JANUARY 14, 2014 

 

21st Century Wire says…

Still, most people are in denial that these kind of elitist programs actually exist… 

This 2-in-1 report by; Aaron Dykes and Jurriaan Maessan, provided the detail and the depth — please read and share this article…

 

How the Rockefeller Foundation Quietly Funded the Anti-Fertility Vaccine..

Aaron Dykes — Truthstream Media

 

Elites like the Rockefellers, and dynastic underlings like Bill Gates, seem obsessed with vaccines and the proliferation of dispensaries – particularly in the Third World. Such an elitist ‘health’ project is disguised behind deceptive labels:

“Other lines of current immunological contraceptive research continue to seek what, during the 1930s, Max Mason of the Rockefeller Foundation called “anti-hormones”: vaccines to block hormones needed for very early pregnancy and a vaccine to block the hormone needed for the surface of the egg to function properly”.
The Rockefellers, one of the world’s wealthiest families, have been the largest financial backer of Eugenics and other population control measures.
Author Jurriaan Maessan stumbled upon some very compelling and important research back in 2010 while digging through annual reports for the Rockefeller Foundation that conclusively prove that it funded numerous research projects into the development “anti-fertility” vaccines, with its origins in scientific research dating back to at least 1968, and with successful research conducted by at least 1988. There now exists several methods to sterilize both men and women by injection, as well as to terminate pregnancies and/or induce spontaneous abortions.

This is highly significant research because the Rockefeller family, dating back to oil baron John D. Rockefeller, has been on the cutting edge of financing Eugenics policy and research. Rockefeller and other primarily Anglo elites based in the U.S. East Coast and England fostered /festered a whole paradigm of social policy centered around the quack science that asserted that the superiority of some gene stocks over others was provable, while seeking various ways to reduce the populations of the “lesser” genetic groups of the world.
EUGENICS SPECIAL: Global Extermination Database Exposed…

This racist ideology manifest in Eugenics laws in 27 U.S. states, and later in Nazi Germany, also taking root in much of the Western world. The Rockefeller family, among others, financed Eugenics research at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Nazi Germany, where some of the most horrifying “scientific” research was conducted – including the work of Josef Mengele.
Following World War II, Eugenics was re-branded to cast of its associations with the Nazis, and emerged, as it were, in the form of such social policy topics as “population control”, “family planning”, abortion/Planned Parenthood, health care, various types of genetics, even laced in between such screeds as global warming/climate change – which leads to arguments about reducing the burden of over-population upon the earth.

Today, figures like Bill Gates have been quite open about connecting the use of vaccines, GMOs, health care and reducing the population through a (mostly covert) Eugenics – even in the name of reducing the impact of climate change.

The powerful Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation formally tied its agenda to aims of the Rockefeller Foundation, including in its funding for vaccinations and population reduction.

Bill Gates and David Rockefeller were the leading members of a billionaires’ club that met in secret to discuss how to strengthen measures for population control, particularly in the developing world, through the guise of “philanthropy”. Other notable members include Ted Turner, George Soros, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, and Michael Bloomberg.

Worse, there is evidence that these anti-fertility vaccines – developed through Rockefeller-funded research – may have been used covertly used in several developing nations (for instance, in the Philippines), where women experienced loss of pregnancy after receiving tetanus shots – one of the main carriers for the Rockefeller-funded HcG anti-fertility vaccine.

(image): Elite ‘humanitarian’ David Rockefeller

 

Below is Jurriaan Maessan’s original and groundbreaking report…

Rockefeller Anti-Fertility Vaccines Exposed..

Jurriaan Maessan — ExplosiveReports.com
In the course of August and September 2010, I wrote several articles for Infowars on the Rockefeller Foundation’s admitted funding and developing of anti-fertility vaccines intended for “mass-scale distribution”.

As the soft-kill depopulation agenda accelerates it seems all the more relevant to re-post these articles as one.

Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines For “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction

In its 1968 yearly report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 onward we read:

“(…) several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here”.

The possibility of using vaccines to reduce male fertility was something that needed to be investigated further, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, because both the oral pill and the IUD were not suitable for mass-scale distribution:

“We are faced with the danger that within a few years these two “modern” methods, for which such high hopes have been held, will in fact turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale”.

“A semipermanent or renewable subcutaneous implant of these hormones has been suggested, but whether or not the same difficulties would result has not been determined”.

Saying that research thus-far had been too low-grade to produce any substantial results, the report was adamant:

 

“The Foundation will endeavour to assist in filling this important gap in several ways:

 

1. “Seeking out or encouraging the development of, and providing partial support to, a few centres of excellence in universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad in which the methods and points of view of molecular biology are teamed with the more traditional approaches of histology, embryology, and endocrinology in research pertinent to development of fertility control methods;” 

 

2. “Supporting research of individual investigators, oriented toward development of contraceptive methods or of basic information on human reproduction relevant to such developments;”

 

3. “Encouraging, by making research funds available, as well as by other means, established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control;”
4. “Encouraging more biology and biochemistry students to elect careers in reproductive biology and human fertility control, through support of research and teaching programs in departments of zoology, biology, and biochemistry”.
The list goes on and on. Motivation for these activities, according to the RF?

“There are an estimated five million women among America’s poverty and near-poverty groups who need birth control service (…). The unchecked fertility of the indigent does much to perpetuate poverty, undereducation, and underemployment, not only in urban slums, but also in depressed rural areas”.

It wasn’t long before all the Foundation’s efforts began to have effect. In itsannual report of 1988, The RF was happy to report the progress made by the Foundation’s Population Division in the field of anti-fertility vaccines:

“India’s National Institute of Immunology successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation, the trials established that with each of the tested vaccines, at least one year of protection against pregnancy could be expected, based on the levels of antibodies formed in response to the immunization schedule”.

In its 1997 review of anti-fertility vaccines, Indian based International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology didn’t forget to acknowledge its main benefactor:

“The work on LHRH and HCG vaccines was supported by research grants of The Rockefeller Foundation, (…)”.

In the 1990s the work on anti-fertility vaccines went in overdrive, especially in third-world nations, as did the funding provided by the deep pockets of the Rockefeller Foundation. At the same time, the target-population of the globalists- women- began to stir uncomfortably with all this out-in-the-open talk of population reduction and vaccines as a means to achieve it.

Betsy Hartman, Director of the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College, Massachusetts and “someone who believes strongly in women’s right to safe, voluntary birth control and abortion”, is no supporter of the anti-fertility vaccine, as brought into being by the Rockefeller Foundation. She explains in her essay Population control in the new world order:

“Although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as ‘safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible’. The scientific community knows very well that such assertions are false – for instance, many questions still remain about the vaccine’s long-term impact on the immune system and menstrual cycle. There is also evidence on film of women being denied information about the vaccine in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the vaccine is being prepared for large-scale use”.
READ MORE EUGENICS NEWS AT —
21st Century Wire — Eugenics Files:

https://21stcenturywire.com/tag/eugenics/